• JustAnotherKay
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    67
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Looks to be proper open source too, not just open weights or open parameters

    • vinnymac
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      Not sure what your definition of proper is, but the license is restrictive and wouldn’t be described as free nor open.

      • JustAnotherKay
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        The source code for the AI is open for you to read, afaik. I didn’t actually find a link to the code on the site but it claimed the source code was open

        • vinnymac
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yea it can be read, but it’s generally considered open source when it is both readable and modifiable, and this is not. In a commercial setting this would need a license approved by OSI as well.

          Code that can be read but not used for much isn’t in the spirit of open source. It reminds me of a rich kid who gets yet another new toy and wants everyone to see what they have for attention but won’t let them touch it. We should call this something else entirely, perhaps readable source.