• @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      7610 months ago

      If the radiation levels are truly negligible then the media shares blame for getting people upset over it.

      • chaogomu
        link
        fedilink
        8410 months ago

        Oil companies are ultimately to blame. After all, it was the Rockefeller Foundation who did the early radiation studies in the 50s, and then blatantly lied about the results to make radiation sound super scary. They claimed that there was no safe dose of radiation, and that any exposure, no matter how small, led to a direct, linear, increase in cancer risk.

        And then the oil companies funded politicians who declared education to be the enemy, so now Americans don’t know enough physics to know that every day, they are swimming in safe doses of ionizing radiation. That ocean water has millions of tons of natural uranium oxide dissolved in it.

        US nuclear policy has been based off of these lies, it’s part of why nuclear power is so expensive.

        Those same oil companies actually paid to found Greenpeace and Friends of the Earth to specifically advocate against nuclear power, by spreading fear and lies about how nuclear physics work.

        The Rockefeller foundation still funds Greenpeace, and still requires that Greenpeace be anti-nuclear to receive that funding. All while being heavily invested in oil.

        • @30mag
          link
          English
          1
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          deleted by creator

          • chaogomu
            link
            fedilink
            210 months ago

            Because those are Military. They need to work and not be dependent on a few multi-national companies for fuel.

            Besides, those things are designed by people who actually know nuclear physics, and are not hamstrung by review boards and astroturf protest movements.

            • @30mag
              link
              English
              1
              edit-2
              8 months ago

              deleted by creator

              • chaogomu
                link
                fedilink
                210 months ago

                Yes, oil is a massive issue for world militaries. You just figured that part out?

                Also, you missed part of the sentence;

                not hamstrung by review boards and astroturf protest movements.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -4810 months ago

          Greenpeace has been boycotting oil companies before you were even born. Nuclear isn’t green and neither is oil. Don’t spread misinformation

          • chaogomu
            link
            fedilink
            3210 months ago

            And also accepting oil money to fight against nuclear power. They were literally founded to spread the lie that nuclear isn’t green.

            Hell, you can look it up for yourself, they still take money from the Rockefeller Foundation.

            They have never been as blatantly owned by oil money as Friends of the Earth, which was founded by a man who hated nuclear much more than he hated oil company money.

            The current Rockefeller Foundation pretends to care about the environment. They even (partially) divested from oil company stocks a couple years ago.

          • @elscallr
            link
            English
            610 months ago

            Nuclear energy is the closest thing we’ve got to green energy that we’re going to get for the foreseeable future. Anyone opposing it is an idiot.

    • @scarabic
      link
      English
      910 months ago

      Truly. The evacuation order itself killed more people around Fukushima than radiation did.

            • @scarabic
              link
              English
              510 months ago

              It is. And it’s maddening that people just say the word Fukushima as evidence against the viability of nuclear power. Radiation is such a boogeyman to people. Not well understood. And I don’t even think people know that there was a tsunami that killed 2000 people. 1 death from radiation - a plant worker.

              Sure, let’s discard a high capacity, carbon-neutral, baseline-capable form of energy over this.

              People don’t even know that smokestacks on coal fired power plants spew radiation into the atmosphere. The fact that nuclear deposits it in barrels is actually a plus.

    • @clutchmatic
      link
      English
      610 months ago

      Also, no news piece ever mentioned how far from the coast Japan is planning to release that water

    • roguetrick
      link
      fedilink
      6
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      It’s reasonable to be concerned about the long term health effects of tritiated water. It’s very unlikely this will have any effects though. It’s only like a few grams. I bet fusion power would produce a whole lot more, even through the blanket. That could have considerable local health effects.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      410 months ago

      Yes, the ignorance is mainly caused by governments and lobbies keeping quiet about what actually happened and washing down data

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2110 months ago

        More like, ignorance caused by my local news deciding to run a story telling people there is a controversy, without making a simple statement like the water is less radioactive than a banana. There’s a controversy in part because the media encourages it, at almost every opportunity.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -810 months ago

          If you believe it’s safer than a banana why don’t you go living in Futaba? I heard the houses are pretty cheap there

      • roguetrick
        link
        fedilink
        610 months ago

        Most folks, including nuclear advocates, have little understanding of either fission products or neutron activation. They really have no need to. I don’t think the data isn’t there if you look for it though. It’s just not simple to understand.

  • @BertramDitore
    link
    English
    7310 months ago

    Holy crap. This is how I find out that Rahm Emanuel is the US Ambassador to Japan? How is he possibly qualified for that job?

      • @theragu40
        link
        English
        610 months ago

        Similarly, the former mayor of Milwaukee is now the ambassador to Luxembourg. He didn’t get that because he was qualified, he got it because he did favors for people in high places and it gets him paid to do literally nothing.

    • Very_Bad_Janet
      link
      fedilink
      1010 months ago

      I didn’t read the article, just saw the picture in the post and thought "that dude looks a lot like Rahm Emanuel. " TIL.

      • @BertramDitore
        link
        English
        410 months ago

        Lol yup! I only read the article because I saw his face and was like “what is Rahm Emanuel doing as the thumbnail for a story about Japan??”

        • @PainInTheAES
          link
          English
          610 months ago

          Now I want to see Rahm go to a maid cafe

      • @BertramDitore
        link
        English
        14
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        He’s a former Chief of Staff to Obama and the former mayor of Chicago. From what I know about him, which granted isn’t a ton, he has zero experience in international diplomacy aside from whatever he might have seen second-hand as Chief of Staff.

          • @BertramDitore
            link
            English
            710 months ago

            True, it’s one of the most powerful positions in American government, but I guess I’m still a naive idealist when it comes to global diplomacy. I just really wish there was an expert on Japan in the job. East Asia is only getting more complicated for the US, and Rahm Emanuel is famous for his extreme temper and lack of poise in high pressure situations.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              1210 months ago

              It’s been my observation that ambassadorships are often given out as rewards or for other domestic political purposes. The career foreign service people whose job it is to do the real work of diplomacy aren’t political appointees

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              310 months ago

              Yikes. Being famous for not being able to operate under pressure doesn’t seem good for a job under which you have to deal with high pressure…

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                1410 months ago

                He’s not ambassador to China. An ambassadorship to Japan is relatively low pressure, mostly revolving around organizing and attending social events.

                American embassies are usually underfunded and ambassadors often have to pay for social events out-of-pocket, which is one reason why the job often goes to wealthy people.

        • @notatoad
          link
          English
          33
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          There’s two types of ambassadors: for countries you have tense relationships with, you send the professional diplomats who are really good at negotiating for things without starting wars.

          For countries who are friends and you aren’t going to have tough negotiations with them, you send somebody who has good connections to the president. The ambassador gets a cushy job for 4 years that’s basically a reward, and the foreign country gets the message that an ambassadorship there is treated as a reward for the president’s friends, which strengthens the relationship

          • @xylogx
            link
            English
            110 months ago

            He was recently interviewed by Steven Dubner on Freakanomics. He said he was offered the choice of China or Japan and that he chose Japan.

    • xuxebiko
      link
      fedilink
      510 months ago

      is Biden trying to get rid of Obama’s pals?

      find out from your nearest kookie-conspiracy channel.

  • SeaJ
    link
    fedilink
    English
    3610 months ago

    This will be fine for him but I am reminded of Thomas Midgely Jr who popularized using lead as an additive. He showed how safe it was by breathing in leaded exhaust fumes. He very shortly after took a vacation which was really just him recovering from lead poisoning.

    Fuck that guy. His death was pretty hilarious though. He got polio and was largely bed ridden. He made a serious of pulleys to help himself work. He got tangled in it and accidentally hung himself.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1010 months ago

      I know too little about radioactive water and what the acceptable amount is for a person to eat through a fish that has been swimming in it

      But holy shit can these stupid politicians who also don’t know shit about it stop insulting everyone’s intelligence with Simpsons (was literally an episode) like ways of convincing people.

      I only trust well regarded scientists and experts, not some slimy politician. Literally kindergarten tier persuasion tactics.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        210 months ago

        In fairness there have been hundreds (750+) of Simpsons episodes so they’re bound to have done some that line up with reality. I’m really sick of people saying the Simpsons predicted something considering those numbers.

    • @UnculturedSwine
      link
      English
      9
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      That strikes me as more sad than funny. I don’t understand why you would screw yourself over so thoroughly just to try and convince the world that you didn’t screw them over. Everyone loses.

      • @foggianism
        link
        English
        510 months ago

        When you ego is more important than all of humanity (yourself included).

      • SeaJ
        link
        fedilink
        English
        210 months ago

        Money.

        He also figured out that CFCs were great for refrigerants and popularized their use.

    • @flucksy_bango
      link
      English
      9
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Your understating how destructive that man was. He’ll probably end up killing more people than anyone in history.

      You can’t blame global warming on one person, but he was a huge and significant factor in it.

    • @30mag
      link
      English
      2
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      deleted by creator

  • roguetrick
    link
    fedilink
    2310 months ago

    Just tritium. Nothing too major about it and it doesn’t stick around compared to fission products. Good candidate for dumping into the ocean.

  • @legion02
    link
    English
    1610 months ago

    Didn’t know Rahm went from mayor of Chicago to Ambassador to Japan.

    • @WorldieBoi
      cake
      link
      English
      510 months ago

      Something’s fishy about Rahm.

  • AutoTL;DRB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1210 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    Japan began releasing more than 1 million metric tons of radioactive water from a wrecked nuclear power plant on Thursday, prompting widespread concerns over contamination and safety.

    The decision to release the wastewater has been a controversial one, sparking protests in Japan and further afield in South Korean capital Seoul from antinuclear activists and those concerned about contamination.

    The UN has backed Japan’s assessment of the situation, with the organization’s nuclear regulator saying it is safe to release the water, and that doing so will have a negligible impact on environmental health.

    Protesters gathered in Japan and South Korea this week to push back against the release of the radioactive water, with much of the concern centering around possible contamination, particularly of seafood.

    In July, a public survey found that 62% of South Koreans would cut back or stop eating seafood after the water was discharged, according to news agency Reuters—despite Seoul pledging to closely monitor the release.

    In recent weeks, some consumers in China—Japan’s biggest export market for seafood—also questioned whether it would be safe to eat the country’s seafood products after the water was released into the ocean.


    The original article contains 590 words, the summary contains 190 words. Saved 68%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1110 months ago

    Reminds me of that guy who launched himself against a window to demonstrate how unbreakable they were

    • @scarabic
      link
      English
      110 months ago

      At least that would prove/disprove something.

      You could eat an unsafely irradiated fish and it’s not like you would drop dead before the last bite.

      Still. Anxiety about Fukushima radiation has always been massively overblown.

      Quick: without googling, someone tell me how many people died at Fukushima, and how many of those where from radiation.

  • @aufheben
    link
    English
    510 months ago

    Straight out of the Obama playbook

    • @UnculturedSwine
      link
      English
      310 months ago

      “This fish I’m about to eat is totally from the area where the radioactive water was dumped and not something we imported from a clean environment.”

  • @Etterra
    link
    English
    510 months ago

    Ambassador: Joke’s on them, I’m already dead on the inside.

  • @qbus
    link
    English
    310 months ago

    Good. We’re going to feed him a bunch of Plymouth oysters if they ever dump the nuclear water from the pilgrim power plant in Cape cod Bay too.

  • theinspectorst
    link
    fedilink
    -6
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    In 1990, as the BSE (‘mad cow disease’) crisis in the UK was unfolding and shortly after scientists had found proof that the disease could indeed cross species, the Agriculture Secretary John Gummer went on national TV to try to force his four-year-old daughter to eat a beef burger for the cameras, to convince the public to keep eating British beef.

    Several hundred people ended up dying from CJD (the human variant caused by eating infected beef). It remains one of the most widely derided photo ops in British political history.

    • @afraid_of_zombies
      link
      English
      2810 months ago

      Right but that isn’t really comparable. Radiation has been studied for over a century while prions were a total unknown at the time.

      Just because one person does one dumb thing on camera doesn’t mean that everyone facing a camera does dumb things.

      • theinspectorst
        link
        fedilink
        810 months ago

        Right, I’m not suggesting otherwise. I’m just observing that, for someone who remembers that time, seeing a politician eating for the cameras to prove some food is safe brings to mind this very specific unfortunate example.

        • livus
          link
          fedilink
          210 months ago

          For me it brought to mind Thomas Midgley, who did a public stunt where he poured petrol lead additive over his hands and gave himself lead poisoning twice.

    • PenguinJuice
      link
      fedilink
      -110 months ago

      Yikes that is pretty diabolical. Using children to prove a point is horrible.