• @droidpenguin
    link
    English
    471 year ago

    That’s great! Deceptive pricing is so annoying. First time I had to rent a U-Haul, I quickly learned it does not cost $19.95. Not even close.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        12
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Did you pay to rent pads today to nit break your shit? Well they aren’t in the truck, so all well. Sure we will take that off your bill wink wink.

        Enjoy arguing with us for the money we said we would refund after doing a crazy stressful move!

    • @pdxfed
      link
      English
      111 year ago

      All the vacation rental places are appalling. Cleaning few. Pool few. Resort fee. Service fee. Processing fee.

      Restaurants are starting on the cash grab a few years back, mostly the ones owned by private equity firms. Mandatory service fee couched as a gratuity, which it most often isn’t, so the guest and the servers get fucked.

  • Hildegarde
    link
    English
    321 year ago

    This law does not ban hidden fees. There are plenty of hidden fees that this law does nothing about.

    This law makes it illegal to advertise a price that doesn’t account for included fees. If a concert ticket is $40 with a $20 “service” fee, this law would require the tickets to be listed as $60 tickets. This law does not require taxes to be included in advertised prices, sales tax is added after the advertised price.

    This law only prohibits misleading advertising of pricing, it however does not require disclosure of pricing.

    The biggest source of hidden fees is the medical billing. Healthcare costs are nearly all hidden fees because healthcare providers rarely disclose prices in advance. This bill does nothing about that, because if a price is not advertised, this bill does not effect it, and this bill does not require disclosure of pricing in advance.

    This bill is an improvement. This bill will reduce misrepresentation of pricing, but it does not actually ban hidden fees outright.

    • Rouxibeau
      link
      English
      111 year ago

      What about pricing like at my local Kroger store where in the list 99 cents with digital coupon and a QR code and then teeny teeny tiny text that says $3.99 regular price.

    • @AliasAKA
      link
      English
      201 year ago

      And cell phone carriers! This is just common sense. We need more of this.

    • @LeadSoldier
      link
      English
      81 year ago

      Watch out every company I deal with. Even my utilities can’t give me an answer of where the extra fees are going.

  • @PeleSpirit
    link
    English
    27
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    deleted by creator

    • @LeadSoldier
      link
      English
      221 year ago

      If I am a small business and I advertise one price and sell it for another. It’s called bait and switch and it’s illegal. If you’re a big company, they have to write special rules for you I guess.

      • Hildegarde
        link
        English
        14
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Edit: I misremembered the text, “This practice, like other forms of bait and switch advertising, is prohibited by existing statutes” This law will probably make enforcement easier because the law is now more specific.

        Under California law it’s not a bait and switch to advertise a base price before fees. That’s why they passed this law. The text of the bill mentions the fact that this sort of pricing did not violate California’s bait and switch laws prior to its introduction.

  • @holiday
    link
    English
    81 year ago

    All this legislation coming out of Cali seems too good to be true

  • iAmTheTot
    link
    fedilink
    81 year ago

    Does this mean stores will list prices with tax included? >_>

    • JasSmith
      link
      fedilink
      101 year ago

      It’s so crazy they don’t have to do that in America. Advertised prices should include all fees and taxes.

      • @dingus
        link
        English
        11
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I’m guessing it might be because tax rates vary so wildly in the US. Every state has their own percentage of state taxes, and then many counties and cities have their own specific tax rate on top of that.

        A company might sell a product nationwide, and it’s easier for them to do national advertising that their product is $100 + local taxes than it is for them to make hundreds upon hundreds of different local ads with a precise dollar amount.

        • @seaQueue
          link
          English
          91 year ago

          Sales tax varies per county in many places so I don’t see advertising including tax in the price being a thing any time soon here.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              4
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              * per location in part of city (overlapping districts), and also dependent upon the type of merchandise being sold.

        • Hildegarde
          link
          English
          4
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Why should the laws be specifically designed to make things easier for advertisers to the detriment of everyone else?

          • @dingus
            link
            English
            21 year ago

            ??? Tax variations among regions were not created to benefit advertisers

            • Hildegarde
              link
              English
              21 year ago

              Allowing advertisers to avoid accounting for tax regions in their advertising absolutly is.

        • JasSmith
          link
          fedilink
          01 year ago

          I’ve no doubt it’s easier for companies, but I don’t really care about making advertising easier for them. I prefer to make life easier for consumers. Regional taxes and fees and levies aren’t unique to America. How they handle this in other countries is either regional advertising or normalising the price nationally and potentially eating a loss in some high tax areas. The price can also settle a little higher in some regions if the product has low elasticity of demand. Either way, it gives consumers much more information up front.

    • Hildegarde
      link
      English
      2
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      No, taxes are specifically exempted.

  • @Kungolicious
    link
    English
    81 year ago

    I hope this will make it clear how much people actually pay on their retirement accounts. Far too many people I talk to don’t realize that they are paying an “expense ratio” on their investment funds.

  • @seaQueue
    link
    English
    11 year ago

    deleted by creator