European regulator Thierry Breton shared a stern letter to TikTok CEO Shou Zi Chew on Thursday, claiming his office has “indications” that the platform is being used to distribute disinformation and illegal content around the ongoing Israel-Hamas war.

Breton serves as the European commissioner for the internal market. He said TikTok must be “timely, diligent and objective” about removing misinformation, particularly since minors often turn to the platform as a source of news.

Breton issued similar letters to X owner Elon Musk and Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg this week.

“First, given that your platform is extensively used by children and teenagers, you have a particular obligation to protect them from violent content depicting hostage taking and other graphic videos which are reportedly widely circulating on your platform, without appropriate safeguards,” Breton wrote in the letter.

    • Hyperreality
      link
      fedilink
      71
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Auto-replied with a poop emoji probably. That’s a thing the twitter press office does apparently.

      In Musk’s defense, it would be hilarious if twitter’s response to the EU, the German authorities and others is a poop emoji, and this is the final straw that results in the EU handing out the maximum fine of 300 million dollars, and Germany handing out the potential maximum fine of 30 billion euros under NetzDG legislation for the 600 cases that had been reported by april.

    • ugjka
      link
      English
      118 months ago

      He is behind seven proxies on Starlink somewhere deep in Nevada, they can’t get him if they wanted

          • @uis
            link
            English
            108 months ago

            All EU needs to do is spin-up national mastodon instanstance. Germany AFAIK already did it.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              -28 months ago

              That would be nice, but I don’t think they’re ready to give that much power over to free technologies.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            38 months ago

            We would be grumbling, but alternatives would pop out of the woodwork in record time.

            After which Xitter would be regarded the same as MySpace.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              18 months ago

              but alternatives would pop out of the woodwork in record time.

              No they wouldn’t. But I guess we’d have to test to see.

          • YⓄ乙
            link
            fedilink
            English
            28 months ago

            This is true. My manager is an idiot and a social media addict.

  • Hyperreality
    link
    fedilink
    498 months ago

    For those wondering how much this would cost, here’s a techcrunch article about similar threats to twitter:

    https://techcrunch.com/2023/04/06/elon-musk-twitter-germany-hate-speech-takedowns/amp/

    Key points:

    • The EU could fine twitter up to 6% of global annual turnover, which would amount to roughly 300 million.
    • But that’s just the EU. National governments can also issue fines. For example, NetzDG fines can be as high as 50 million per case(!!!), which means twitter’s facing a fine of up to 30 billion for the 600 cases they were dealing with in april. Almost certainly more since then.

    TLDR: stuff like this is potentially an existential threat for social media companies. Not just a cost of business and something they can ignore.

  • @Rhoeri
    link
    English
    268 months ago

    Misinformation? On TikTok? A platform full of idiots who will believe anything?

    Say it ain’t so!

  • rebul
    link
    fedilink
    218 months ago

    I’m interested in what misinformation they are referring to.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    218 months ago

    Yay, an other 24 hour deadline.

    I’m loving these. Really makes them sweat because they can’t put hundreds of lawyers on it in order to spin their answer however way they want. There just isn’t enough time. So they will need to be truthful.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -458 months ago

    Look at that, speech that goes against the mainstream is being pushed out. It’s almost like there’s an incentive for states with a history of financially and materially supporting Israel’s apartheid to hide the truth and manipulate narratives in their favor…

    • Hyperreality
      link
      fedilink
      35
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      speech that goes against the mainstream is being pushed out … there’s an incentive for states with a history of financially and materially supporting Israel’s apartheid to hide the truth

      Article:

      “First, given that your platform is extensively used by children and teenagers, you have a particular obligation to protect them from violent content depicting hostage taking and other graphic videos which are reportedly widely circulating on your platform, without appropriate safeguards,” Breton wrote in the letter.

      Ie. one of the things they’re asking TikTok to not show children, is videos of Hamas taking hostages. Videos which would in fact help Israel’s case, not hurt it.

      Look, don’t take this the wrong way, but when was the last time you read a full article and not just a summary?

      Because it sounds like you may be functionally illiterate, given you jumped to the wrong conclusion so easily. Perhaps spend a little less time on the phone and social media, and more time reading full length articles or maybe a book or two. You’re certainly not alone in this, it’s a rising and worrying phenomenon, but something you personally can actually do something about.

      • TheaoneAndOnly27
        link
        fedilink
        5
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Sometimes I wish it wouldn’t let you reply until a certain amount of time after you’ve clicked an article. Because I feel like a lot of people just jump right into the comments and start talking without reading.

      • @dezmd
        link
        English
        -18 months ago

        “Think of the children” is the ultimate bullshit excuse when it comes to censorship by authoritarians, be they liberal, conservative, moderate, or anarchistic.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -48 months ago

          horseshoe theory

          there are no liberal or conservative authoritarians. there is only one time of authoritarian even if they act like they either either liberal or conservative

          • @dezmd
            link
            English
            38 months ago

            Authoritarian comes in many flavors, and they all have different paths they take that end up with the same result, consistently increasing oppression of personal freedoms in the name of various types of safety or morality or justice or ethics. Anyone can adopt authoritarian ideals if they get to comfortable repeating rhetoric without applying any thoughtful considerations.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -18 months ago

            Horseshoe theory is something for people who refuse to actually educate themselves on ideology. Often espoused by ignorant people who are so thoroughly de-politicized that they think they have no ideology, never noticing that that thought it itself is something only someone extremely ideologically captured would have.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -14
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        So, I imagine you realize that nearly all combat footage is available on TikTok. Footage of murders in the Ukraine/Russia war, videos of drones dropping grenades on people from above, videos of burning bodies in bombed out cars… videos of Israeli settlers kidnapping children from off of the streets and beating them to death… it’s all there. Why is this treated so differently from that? Aside, If showing oppressed people taking actions to liberate themselves hurts your opinion of them, you already were on the wrong side of history.

        • Hyperreality
          link
          fedilink
          8
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          In the article:

          Under the European Union’s newly enacted Digital Services Act, TikTok must monitor and remove illegal content such as terrorist content or illegal hate speech. TikTok also has to detail its protocols for doing so.

          Wikipedia:

          On 23 April 2023, the European Commission named a first list of 19 online platforms that will be required to comply starting 25 August 2023.

          Ie. they’re sending out warnings under recently enacted legislation.

          Why is this treated so differently from that?

          Apart from the legislation being new, it isn’t. They’ve been warning companies about this for a while now, before the whole Israel-Hamas thing started. Some examples:

          TechCrunch, April 2023:

          Internal market commissioner, Thierry Breton, warned Musk last November the company has huge work ahead of it to comply with the incoming pan-EU rulebook — under which penalties for breaches can scale up to 6% of global annual turnover.

          US news, January 2023:

          EU’s Breton Warns TikTok CEO: Comply With New Digital Rules

          You keep missing essential bits of the article and not connecting the dots.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -38 months ago

            Notice the weasel word of terrorism? So, what Hamas did was terrorism, but what Israel does on a daily basis is just what… geopolitics? I’ve yet to see a state that calls to ban Israeli nationalists from platforms for spreading complete falsehoods, like the whole beheaded babies lie that’s going around now (and being amplified by the president of the United States). That is definitively misinformation, and the use of such falsehoods to attempt to justify Israel’s response is itself an act of terrorism, using fear and intimidation to pursue political goals.

            • @HandBreadedTools
              link
              English
              -28 months ago

              They released proof of the murdered babies thing today. Feel free to check my comment history for a link if you want. The PM of Israel posted some of the pictures on X.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                3
                edit-2
                8 months ago

                That wasn’t my claim, I said they’re spreading misinformation claiming that babies are being beheaded, and the president of the United States is amplifying that claim, on National TV to boot. Something which no one has proof of, not the Israeli government, not the American government, no one.

                That is sad though, I haven’t seen the dead babies myself yet, thankfully.

                • @HandBreadedTools
                  link
                  English
                  -4
                  edit-2
                  8 months ago

                  I’m not sure I understand what you mean. I’m saying they literally provided proof today of those dead babies, some of which were beheaded. It makes sense Biden would have been shown them before they were made public, too.

                  I said they’re spreading misinformation claiming that babies are being beheaded, and the president of the United States is amplifying that claim, on National TV to boot. Something which no one has proof of, not the Israeli government, not the American government, no one

                  This is exactly what I am claiming is incorrect. (Writing this to be absolutely clear)

                  Edit: found a really good article about it https://www.reuters.com/world/nato-ministers-shown-horrific-video-hamas-attack-2023-10-12/

                  Edit 2: in the article it says the white house later clarified Biden did not see the images, this is incorrect. The white house correspondent said it could not be confirmed, not that he had not seen them. Those are two very different statements lol.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -18 months ago

      LOL it’s not like there is room for interpretation on objective truth. Mainstream = what we see, but you want us to disbelieve our own eyes.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -38 months ago

        What objective truth would that be? That Israel is an apartheid state that has engaged in active genocide for decades?