Lawrence Faucette, the second living person to receive a genetically modified pig heart in a transplant, has died six weeks after the experimental procedure. The University of Maryland Medical Center, where the experimental procedure had been performed, said the heart began to show signs of rejection in recent days.

“Mr. Faucette’s last wish was for us to make the most of what we have learned from our experience, so others may be guaranteed a chance for a new heart when a human organ is unavailable. He then told the team of doctors and nurses who gathered around him that he loved us. We will miss him tremendously,” Dr. Bartley Griffith, clinical director of the Cardiac Xenotransplantation Program at the University of Maryland School of Medicine, said in a statement. Griffith had performed the experimental surgery.

      • Track_Shovel
        link
        fedilink
        English
        727 months ago

        Honestly. He’s helping pave the way so that people who have heart issues could potentially have replacements one day. Not just old dudes, but kids too.

        Even if pig hearts never pan out, he got 6 more weeks with his loved ones.

      • @cactusupyourbutt
        link
        187 months ago

        friendly reminder that you do not need to be old to plant trees. If you have a choice to take part in a scientific study, please do. Its usually quite easy.

        personally for me it was a double blind study about tapering from steroids. so a month of tapering (or not, idk, it was blind), and then a few phone calls over 6 months.

        • Chetzemoka
          link
          fedilink
          67 months ago

          Thank you so much for participating in that. That’s not an exciting thing to study, but man it’s important in deciding what’s the best course of treatment for patients. Your life might not have been on the line, but I still think you’re a hero and I appreciate you.

      • fmstrat
        link
        fedilink
        English
        27 months ago

        This comment is so good I read it aloud to others. You win English today.

        • @NegativeInf
          link
          2
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          It’s a paraphrase. “Society grows great when old men plant trees whose shade they know they will never sit in.” There are many versions across history. But no matter its source, it’s a lovely sentiment.

  • ArugulaZ
    link
    fedilink
    1137 months ago

    My grandpa had a pig heart valve, and that thing lasted way longer than its warranty suggested. Yeah, he was told up front it would last ten years, but he got more out of it.

  • @Dazza
    link
    967 months ago

    A lot of people think that regular human transplants are problem free but the vast majority of them are rejected by the receiver. If it’s for a life saving procedure it can only extend the life span by so much…

    • @ZapBeebz_
      link
      567 months ago

      My dad had a double lung transplant several months ago…we were told by his transplant team that, with transplants, rejection is a “when”, not an “if”. However, if caught early enough, the docs can do an incredible amount to combat rejection.

      • @lennybird
        link
        English
        197 months ago

        Complete layperson here but it kind of astounds me that we haven’t cracked the code for this friend-or-foe identification. One would think there is some identifier or expression that is evaluated by the immune system and if we could match that we’d be golden but clearly not that simple.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          397 months ago

          We can’t even cure autoimmune diseases yet. Why the fuck has my immune system decided my own tissues are the enemy?! Such a dick move.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          187 months ago

          I started reading the book Immune by the team that runs the Kurzgesagt (In a Nutshell) YouTube channel. The book is written for laypeople like us to understand, but I didn’t get very far before going “holy shit this is ridiculously complicated”. Honestly, just the fact that scientists understand any of this astounds me.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            4
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            Years of dedication, my friend.

            Surprisingly, things become simpler when there are more eyes looking at them. The more esoteric something is, the harder it will be to grasp because there are fewer resources to help you.

        • @Elivey
          link
          87 months ago

          Taking immunology right now, it’s incredibly complicated. Immune cells aren’t like any other cells in our bodies, they’re absolutely bonkers.

        • @thenightisdark
          link
          67 months ago

          Our bodies are just winging it. It’s both beautiful and goodness and all kinds of other things but it’s a bit philosophical at times.

          I had ITP. Autoimmune something which means they don’t know what caused it but my body stopped acknowledging that parts of my blood cell, not the entire one just a piece of it, we’re not me. Of course not me gets flushed out.

          But the fancy words for part of a blood cell is called a platelet if you don’t have any platelets you don’t clot. As you can probably pick up not being able to clot is a big problem. I was in danger of bleeding out because my body decided to take out all my platelets.

          Seems like an easy problem. If a whole blood cell is me because the DNA matches and all kinds of other things, obviously one cell of me is one cell of me. But if you take one cell of me and you break it up into pieces is it still one cell of me? By definition is not it is 50% of me…

          So one cell of me is obviously me and one cell of you is obviously you but what happens when we get into percents at what percent does my cell stop becoming me?

        • GladiusB
          link
          67 months ago

          Biology is not as simple as 1s and 0s. We want it too be. But it’s just more complex.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          27 months ago

          Your body has the miraculous ability to identify ANYTHING that isn’t itself: viruses, fungi, bacteria, even lots of nearly-self things like cancer.

          It’s likely not a solvable problem.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            87 months ago

            Oh it is… we just need to get over the idiots that don’t like stem cell research. If we could clone and grow our own organs it would be a huge step.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          27 months ago

          Fair enough.

          These are very complicated processes that are difficult to interpret with such a (relatively) small number of people looking at it.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        -47 months ago

        Honestly, this might sound weird, but if my body ever got to that point, I’d rather just go die in a war.

        Better to go out with a bang than a wimper, imo.

        • @max
          link
          17 months ago

          Lmao yeah you say that now

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      107 months ago

      I’m just curious if you have data behind this?

      My understanding is that rejection related deaths in solid organ transplant recipients is only ~18% and that it is actually trending downward.

      • @Dazza
        link
        17 months ago

        deleted by creator

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          17 months ago

          That’s not actually how it works. Rejection of a transplanted organ means the body is developing antibodies against the organ.

          Successful dosing and continued use of immunosuppressants inhibit the body from “rejecting” the transplanted organ(s).

          I suspect you’re operating off a commonly held idea that transplanted organs have a “shelf life” but that’s not really true.

          It’s important to keep in mind that transplanting organs is still comparatively new medical science (only about 70 years old) and that transplants are often for older patients or patients with other underlying conditions that caused the original organ failure to begin with.

  • roguetrick
    link
    fedilink
    79
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    It’s tough, these folks are often already in multiorgan failure because those organs were trying to hold up for their failing heart. So now you’ve got shot kidneys and lungs but a brand new heart to try and hold up those failing organs. Then you end up right back into heart failure.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    577 months ago

    I don’t want people to see this as a failure.

    Experiments are how we gain new information to try better the next time.

    • @Veneroso
      link
      467 months ago

      Ultimately these experiments are reserved for people who are ineligible for traditional heart transplants. This person was granted an extra six weeks with their family which is easy to overlook but the family likely cherished every moment.

  • SeaJ
    link
    fedilink
    23
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    I guess we’ll have to wait a bit to find out what killed him. The first person died due to several things like his condition and the heart had a pig virus.

    • Flying Squid
      link
      157 months ago

      The pathogen issue is a real hurdle to overcome. I am wondering if we will get viable 3D printed hearts before we get viable transplants from other species.

      • @some_designer_dude
        link
        37 months ago

        3D-printed or stem-cell grown so they’re just new, hot-swappable copies of our own organs, minus defects thanks to CRISPR 🤯