• @ConfusedMeAgain
    link
    English
    401 year ago

    Wow, a huge drop in the last 15 years. I find it interesting what governments are trying to do to encourage higher birth rates (I think South Korea and Japan try to promote more as wel). I understand it’s good for economics but the environmentalist in me is relieved at the thought of fewer people on the planet.

    • @febra
      link
      English
      41 year ago

      Nothing. They’ll do nothing. They will keep protecting their billionaire owners while young people struggle to make ends meet. Then they’ll wonder why no one is having kids

    • @jeffw
      link
      English
      -91 year ago

      A rapidly declining birth rate is bad for old people. Who pays taxes when they retire? Who works to wipe their butts when they can’t any more?

        • @jeffw
          link
          English
          -111 year ago

          Was I implying you didn’t?

          • @angrystego
            link
            English
            41 year ago

            It seems like jeffw was not sure ConfusedMeAgain understood the social implications of the economics and ConfusedMeAgain felt a bit undermined by that, because they mentioned the economics in the first comment already. You probably just agree with each other.

            • @jeffw
              link
              English
              11 year ago

              I certainly thought we did

              • @angrystego
                link
                English
                31 year ago

                That’s great! I’m not really used to people agreeing with each other online, it’s kind of shocking :)

  • elouboub
    link
    fedilink
    251 year ago

    The State proposes to cover up to 3,000 euros a year in social-security contributions for working mothers with two children, with the youngest being under 10, and those with three children or more, with the youngest up to 18

    Hilarious that they think that’s enough.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      141 year ago

      Soon the boomer cry will go from “nobody wants to work” to “nobody wants to have kids”

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      111 year ago

      I guess this is going to be like when flights get oversold. They will start offering $. But then as the flight nears take off they offer $$$ then a few minutes before $$$$$$ +free flight + dinner + hotel +…

      It may be too late by then. Declining population problems are not lineal but geometric in growth (or decline) so increasing incentives later on, even if effective may be too late to stop the decline. This is a much more serious issue than most people believe. And it is also quite time sensitive.

      • @angrystego
        link
        English
        61 year ago

        I suppose perperual growth is not good either, so what is actually the ideal? To stabilize the population numbers? And at what point?

      • @Nudding
        link
        English
        31 year ago

        It’s great for the planet.

  • @febra
    link
    English
    17
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Yet the Italian government still isn’t offering any realistic solutions. They keep attacking the LGBTQ community because apparently they’re the cause for a lack of new births. What they don’t do is attack their rich billionaire owners that keep young people poor, and are in turn actually the cause for such low birth rates. Go figure why young people won’t have kids. No one can afford it.

  • @frequenttimetraveler
    link
    English
    61 year ago

    Interesting that the same record happened in neighbouring greece. Interesting to see if there are regional dynamics in this? Humans are influenced by their physical surrounding

    • @itscozydownhere
      link
      English
      201 year ago

      We just have very low paychecks and you can’t really afford to have children unless you accept to have a shitty life. I didn’t for example. Freedom and money? Sign me up for that shit

      • @frequenttimetraveler
        link
        English
        -21 year ago

        It’s a common justification given, but it’s not true. The same happened in almost every advanced european society in the 80s, when things weren’t unaffordable. Urbanization is probably the largest contributor to this, because children are absolutely optional in city dwellers.

        We should stop pretending we can reverse this trend, and the whole doom-saying around it. Instead southern europe needs to plan for the medium-term future, which necessarily include the transformation/abolition of the unsustainable welfare state paradigm built in the 80s.

        • @gastationsushi
          link
          English
          81 year ago

          Nah, the only unsubstainable welfare in a liberal democracy is welfare for the donor class.

        • @itscozydownhere
          link
          English
          31 year ago

          Oh I completely agree and am happy population is reducing. But Italy’s cities are not getting bigger and most people live in suburban/agricultural areas. We are a very fragmented country made by thousands of small towns with a few thousands inhabitants and that didn’t change. There is no help for families with children and house/rent prices are high, it’s just hard.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      131 year ago

      Surprise, humans are also influenced by whether they can afford a house and kids on a single income.

      • @frequenttimetraveler
        link
        English
        -21 year ago

        Housing definitely plays a role. Or to be more precise, the culture of housing in your neighborhood.

        If we all moved near the romani shantytowns, our birth rate would skyrocket 10x