LONDON (AP) — Four men were charged Monday over the theft of an 18-carat gold toilet from Blenheim Palace, the sprawling English country mansion where British wartime leader Winston Churchill was born.

  • Codex
    link
    457 months ago

    I like how the headline mentions the toilet is “satirical” as if they were worried people might think they had a non-ironic 18k solid golden toilet. I’m sure the thieves were only stealing the toilet as a parody of crime.

    • @SalamendaciousOP
      link
      16
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      You know someone somewhere got their feathers ruffled when they heard about a good gold toilet named America

      Edit-dang swipe to text. :(

      • Codex
        link
        107 months ago

        good toilet named America

        A good toilet in America, now that would be ironic 😉

  • eric
    link
    147 months ago

    I recognize that toilet! No joke, I pooped in it when it was installed in the NYC Guggenheim (where this article’s photo was taken).

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      107 months ago

      I, too, saw that toilet at the Guggenheim. However, I don’t remember it being available to use—how were you so chosen?

      • @SalamendaciousOP
        link
        307 months ago

        Not sure about the Guggenheim but in London the article says:

        The golden toilet was fully functioning, and prior to the theft, visitors to the exhibition could book a three-minute appointment to use it.

        • Patapon Enjoyer
          link
          187 months ago

          how can you know when you’re gonna poop in advance with that amount of precision

      • eric
        link
        11
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        When I was there, there was a short line to use it, so after I learned it was a special toilet, I just got in line. I try not to poop in public toilets as a rule, but this seemed like the ideal exception to make.

        E: also, it’s a real shame that you weren’t allowed to use it, as use was the primary intention of the artist. I googled it to make sure I wasn’t misremembering…

        From the Guggenheim’s website:

        Its participatory nature, in which viewers are invited to make use of the fixture individually and privately, allows for an experience of unprecedented intimacy with a work of art.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          8
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          I think I must have seen it when there was no line. Nobody expressly told me I couldn’t use it, but it was obviously an exhibit, and I don’t make a habit of taking risky poops in art.

          If I had only known…

          • brothershamus
            link
            fedilink
            97 months ago

            I think what we’ve shared here is a teaching moment. Everyone: Poop in Art. They probably want you to!

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              37 months ago

              If there isn’t a sign saying you can’t do something, then that means you probably should. Got it.

          • eric
            link
            67 months ago

            I can completely understand that conclusion. It’s the first and last piece of art that I’ve literally shit on, and it felt weird doing it. It also made me contemplate why toilet seats are the only item in the world that we are ok touching with our skin after many strangers’ bare asses have touched it.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              57 months ago

              It’s because, ideally, only the legs and outer cheeks are touching the seat. If a person with short shorts sits in a chair, nobody thinks twice about sitting in the same chair. One anus brushes a seat, and everyone loses their minds.

              • eric
                link
                37 months ago

                I was never assuming any anus touched a seat. I was only talking about cheeks.

        • @SheeEttin
          link
          English
          17 months ago

          Where does it say you aren’t allowed to use it? That quote says you can.

          • eric
            link
            17 months ago

            Yes, my point was that you can use it. I know because I did use it, and the quote was there to back up my experience.

            • @SheeEttin
              link
              English
              17 months ago

              Oh, “you” referred to that individual instance, I read it as the general.

              This is why more people should adopt the second person plural “y’all”.

              • eric
                link
                27 months ago

                Haha. I’m with you on the “y’all” usage. Ambiguity is annoying.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                17 months ago

                Or we can go back to using the singular thy and reserve you for plural like in romance languages.

              • CashewNut 🏴󠁢󠁥󠁧󠁿
                link
                -17 months ago

                This is why more people should adopt the second person plural “y’all”.

                Oh, heavens, no! I wouldn’t be heard uttering such vulgar language.

    • @SalamendaciousOP
      link
      77 months ago

      Fountain is a readymade sculpture by Marcel Duchamp in 1917, consisting of a porcelain urinal signed “R. Mutt”. In April 1917, an ordinary piece of plumbing chosen by Duchamp was submitted for an exhibition of the Society of Independent Artists, the inaugural exhibition by the Society to be staged at the Grand Central Palace in New York. When explaining the purpose of his readymade sculpture, Duchamp stated they are “everyday objects raised to the dignity of a work of art by the artist’s act of choice.”