Cross posted from Mastodon

  • ChihuahuaOfDoom
    link
    English
    201 year ago

    You can become a cop for $0 in a relatively short amount of time, a librarian needs a masters degree, school nurse is either an associates degree or bachelor’s, the only one that’s relatively easy to become on that list is EMT but it’s still a damn sight harder than becoming a cop. I like what they are saying but there won’t be a shift until higher education is free.

    • @surewhynotlem
      link
      English
      181 year ago

      Or until we require cops to meet some minimum education standard

      • ChihuahuaOfDoom
        link
        English
        10
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        That would be nice, it still blows me away that ignorance of the law is not a legal defense but cops can just make shit up as they go and not be held accountable when they are wrong.

      • @TheDoctorDonna
        link
        English
        21 year ago

        When a person needs a bachelor’s degree to be an administrator or a librarian, but a high school diploma and some vocational education is enough to be given a gun, a badge and the authority that implies, I start to think something might be wrong with the system, not just the people lining up to join it.

        • @surewhynotlem
          link
          English
          11 year ago

          A systemic problem you say? Not in my capitalism!

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      4
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Yes but being an EMT pays between $10 and $15 per hour and often does not even include benefits. God bless every EMT on the road because not a single one is doing it for the money.

      • ChihuahuaOfDoom
        link
        English
        21 year ago

        I just volunteer, $0/hr but I’m hoping to bridge into nursing at some point.

  • @CompostMaterial
    link
    English
    121 year ago

    If you are going to spend the money for a billboard, at least get the grammar correct. “Fewer cops.”

    • Deceptichum
      link
      fedilink
      111 year ago

      Yeah, no.

      That’s a bullshit ”rule” invented by a guy in 1770 based on how he felt it should be said. It’s top down prescriptive grammar that doesn’t reflect the language as spoken by it’s users.

      Descriptive grammar shows that we use less as both a mass and a count noun, and thus it’s perfectly acceptable to be used as such here.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 year ago

        Ok but
        every single linguistic rule is complete bullshit
        Nothing really stands out about that one in particular

    • @jopepa
      link
      English
      41 year ago

      I think it’s trying to reach an audience, ‘fewer’ sounds like the kind $5 word a cop might write a ticket for.