• @coyootje
    link
    English
    81 year ago

    Better squeeze in just a few more exploitative long contracts before UEFA or FIFA steps in

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      41 year ago

      Have the rules around amortising over a max of 5 years not come in yet?

      It seems a bizarre way or circumventing the rules given it is so risky, surely? I could understand it in a sport where the team was less important, the individual more so (possibly baseball?), as it is maybe less likely that a player loses value. The Premier League is littered with players being overpaid and difficult to offload, signed on high contracts by optimistic clubs. Giving relatively unproven players 8 year contracts seems to be asking for trouble…

  • @Uncrasimatic
    link
    English
    71 year ago

    8 years again?!

    These absolute morons. Keep it up Todd!

    • @SaltyWailord
      link
      English
      21 year ago

      Feels absurd to hear these long contracts for players who had performed well for a short period

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 year ago

        It won’t. Saudi has given them a perfect get out jail card for underperforming players on long contracts

  • @pol9reff
    link
    English
    31 year ago

    Picked up nothing from the transfers last window, eh?

    • Limes
      link
      English
      01 year ago

      The American way.

  • IceCapp
    link
    fedilink
    11 year ago

    8 years? That’s some Bartomeu juice they’re sipping.

  • @Boondock
    link
    English
    11 year ago

    It’s going to be fun to look at the Chelsea transfer window at end of this summer.