• @breadsmasher
    link
    English
    87 months ago

    wouldn’t it be six?

    She has two wolves plus two baby wolves

    Each baby wolf would also have two wolves.

      • @breadsmasher
        link
        English
        77 months ago

        Actually yes, I missed two somehow

        • Kogasa
          link
          fedilink
          English
          17 months ago

          You also missed the other infinitely many

      • @Fades
        link
        English
        -27 months ago

        Huh??? No it isn’t 8, the fuck?

        She has two babies, that is three wolves each made up of two wolves inside them: 3*2 or 2+2+2

        In your equation, you say 2 (mom) + 2(kid1) + 2(kid2) which has already taken care of the number of wolves (as each has two inside them) — but then you multiply this summation by two, why?

        I guess you’re splitting it uo differently but it still doesn’t make sense: you’re saying 2 (mom’s wolves) + 2 (kids) + (2 kids wolves) which covers everything because for each kid there is another wolf which you include in the 3rd 2 of your equation, but then you multiply it by two for some reason.

        Even if you were counting the host body as yet another wolf that brings it to 9 not 8.

        • @boeman
          link
          English
          27 months ago

          Plus the 2 kids are both wolves and inside her.

  • @thorbot
    link
    English
    77 months ago

    I’m very tempted to replace the last panel with a pixelated image

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    47 months ago

    What is the whole 2 wolves idea about anyway? I’ve seen memes parodying it but don’t know what it’s actually referring to.

    • @Carnelian
      link
      English
      67 months ago

      It’s from like a motivational thing

      “You have two wolves fighting inside of you. One is darkness and despair, one is light and hope”

      “Which one is going to win?”

      “Whichever one you feed”

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        37 months ago

        Thanks. I’m struggling to write a reply that expresses genuine gratitude to you for explaining that and the fact that I think it’s a dumb concept without it making it sound like my thanking you is sarcastic.

        • @Carnelian
          link
          English
          47 months ago

          Oh no worries haha, yeah it’s a silly story. Basically just a fake deep way of saying “be positive”