• Sabre363
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1151 year ago

    Looks like the Burger King if he lost his crown and did some meth

  • 𝕾𝖕𝖎𝖈𝖞 𝕿𝖚𝖓𝖆
    link
    English
    61
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Unfortunately, it was removed a couple years ago.

    But the Confederate Memorial in Arlington National Cemetery is coming down. So that’s nice.

    • @SupraMario
      link
      301 year ago

      Which sucked that they pulled it down, cause holy fuck was it hilarious watching that thing get vandalized. Pride colors was always a classic go to.

    • Flying Squid
      link
      101 year ago

      Sadly, there’s still a giant carving honoring the Confederacy on a big cliff in Atlanta for all to see. 90 feet tall. And it was definitely part of their heritage because it was completed in… 1972.

      If there was ever a good reason for the invention of dynamite…

  • Iron Lynx
    link
    53
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I heard/read a story somewhere once, where there was a statue somewhere of someone who’s better off not glorified. The statue was defaced regularly, and every time it was defaced, there’d be someone cleaning it up.

    Over time the statue went on to look worse for wear until one day, the authorities decided it was better to remove and replace the statue.

    It turned out the guy cleaning it up was always the same guy, who hated the subject of the statue with a passion, and alway used salt water to clean it, hoping to corrode & wear down the statue. Some people suspect he and the vandal were the same person.

  • @yesman
    link
    251 year ago

    Every monument should fall. The only reason to honor Bob Lee is because he’s responsible for more dead slavers than any three Union generals.

  • Kokesh
    link
    English
    191 year ago

    This is so beautiful! Can you imagine all the degenerates on the ceremony seeing this for the first time?

  • moosetwin
    link
    fedilink
    English
    161 year ago
    “The most perfidious way of harming a cause consists of defending it deliberately with faulty arguments.”

    I considered switching ‘perfidious’ to a word most people have actually heard of, but I decided against it.

  • @Poppa_Mo
    link
    161 year ago

    Read that guy’s biography and I’m not sure this statue is inaccurate lol.

  • Dr. Coomer
    link
    English
    91 year ago

    “Eeeh. Eeeh. SupRemeSY. Eeeh.”

  • DigitalTraveler42
    link
    English
    51 year ago

    Literally just listened to one of my state representatives whine about how pulling down slaver statues is destroying art, well i guess we see why conservatives don’t get art, because they suck at it.

  • Rosco
    link
    fedilink
    -61 year ago

    I don’t know who this guy was and I’m not American, but I dissaprove of people vandalizing or destroying old statues. They should be removed from public view if they’re controversial, but they should be kept (if they have historical significance). Destruction of history, no matter how dark it was, is a crime in my eyes. Nobody would think about destroying concentration camps or the likes, even though they represent the most horrific part of our history. And besides, pretty much everyone born more than two centuries ago were assholes and bigots by today’s standard, it’s hard to judge when most of them probably did not know better. Again, not cautioning what this dude did, probably slavery and a great deal of killing I imagine.

    • Stoneykins [any]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      231 year ago

      Most confederate statues are cheap crap bulk built all over the place sometime after the civil war as a sort of long term propaganda. They aren’t historical, they are reputation management.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        16
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        You should add that the “sometime after” was also often sometime after WWII, so they are not very historical, look ugly and take space.

        • Stoneykins [any]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          41 year ago

          I didn’t want to be more specific than my memory lol, thanks for the detail.

      • voxel
        link
        fedilink
        61 year ago

        like the lenin statues that used to be all over ukraine and other post-soviet countries.

        • Stoneykins [any]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          31 year ago

          I actually don’t know anything about those. Were they put there while the soviet union still existed/built by the soviet union themselves, or were they put there later after by some fan of the soviet union? If the goal is to keep what is historical, regardless of political context, that would be the key distinction in my opinion.

          • voxel
            link
            fedilink
            5
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            soviet union (mass-produced and) placed them literally everywhere.
            there’s at least one lenin or stalin statue per major street, some countries are just starting removing them, but it’s a really long process due to sheer amount of them, regulations and stuff.
            the amount of these things is somewhat absurd

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        51 year ago

        I’d argue most statues are some form of propaganda that likely don’t tell whole stories.

    • @Euphorazine
      link
      61 year ago

      Just to add some context, the statue was on private land. The decision to pull it down was by the owner.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        21 year ago

        And it was installed in the late 90s. That’s not history: it’s a gaudy, racist lawn ornament.

  • @neige
    link
    -7
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Removed by mod