• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    341 year ago

    This is obviously better than Russia, but it ought to be a wake up call to remove dependency on gas altogether.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      101 year ago

      Unfortunately the latest budget indicates they’re not going to hurry up any transition.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    171 year ago

    Then what should they do when Norway starts invading Sweden, they have done it before in 1064!

    • @cbarrick
      link
      English
      31 year ago

      Norway could buy Sweden, if they wanted to. 😉

        • @PrinzMegahertz
          link
          English
          51 year ago

          Nah, our government is run by a free market party, they would never oppose to someone buying something with money

  • @5200
    link
    English
    15
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    deleted by creator

      • @Ramenator
        link
        English
        121 year ago

        Yeah, they are part of the European Economic Area, but not part of the EU proper. Same as Iceland. The main reason for opposing full membership for the longest time has actually been fishing rights, which are often more strict in the EU

        • sab
          link
          fedilink
          91 year ago

          Not necessarily more strict, but joining the Union would open the waters for European fisheries which is politically unpopular.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      81 year ago

      Except for climate reasons, or even the generally beneficial goal of energy independence for its own sake.

      • @5200
        link
        English
        1
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        deleted by creator

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    31 year ago

    Transitioning to renewables would be better, but if we need to depend on one country, I can’t think of one better to rely on than Norway.