Needlessly speciesist but it’s a good start

This article does a good job of connecting things car culture accepts as normal and beneath notice (like free parking) that actually directly feed into urban homelessness and decay.

I don’t even have to click through to know that’s bullshit

Honestly, decent people are so rare, one cannot afford to be fussy about appearance. Fortunately, ethical compatibility is VERY attractive.

Let me answer your question with a question; why isn’t the final frame a mix of sheep and wolves?

I read that somewhere. What can you do, it’s in our DNA.

ok but they’re still wearing murdered lambs; their nature hasn’t changed, they just appropriated culture from their victims.

Appearance is never a sufficient factor on its own, but in my own case appearance, I wouldn’t consider it a disqualifying factor. Though me a few years ago wouldn’t have to try as hard, for sure…

Are there cases where a member state refuses to do so?

Guess Sauble isn’t going to be able to offer safe shelter much longer.

This is why you can’t let your rats play in the back yard. :-(

Can be taken from his wages, if he has any.

It’s interesting to note that the man apparently did nothing criminal. This is a civil matter between him and the library, as though the library were a car mechanic or a dentist that he reneged on an agreement with.

I feel like someplace else might have recognized what I think can fairly be called hate speech, destruction of the commons, and terroristic intent (on a very small scale – destruction of the commons specifically for political effect). Certainly he’s not morally superior to someone who throws soup on a painting or glues themselves to the road for climate activism. I think such activists frequently catch pretty grand charges.

I get that you are laying down some technical language on us, but a tall pan is a pot in common English. Oil pans, bed pans, evaporating pans, gold pans, etc all use “pan” to describe that they are shallow vessels, significantly wider than tall. You can’t “pan for” a heavy particle in a “tall pan” because it’s not functionally a pan; a tall pan is a contradiction.

I would describe a sauce pan as a “culinary pan” but an actual pot, like how a tomato is a culinary vegetable but an actual fruit.

forgot the fourth panel that makes this worth reading

It certainly sucked for those who did, but the majority didn’t have to worry about war.

It’s not like you knew; you were still fucking worried even if you were in the 9/10.

And this is exactly why we can’t have affordable housing. All these boomers go from wealthy retirees to hungry tent dwellers like the rest of us.

Not at all.

politics, values, and kinks are way more important than appearance

Would anyone care to discuss the mechanism something like this would use? Does the EU have the authority to ban things in all member states or would this be something members can choose to opt into? And if they do have the authority, from where does it flow?