This is the type of action Eurovision understands. Financial action.
Not enough of the fans are going to stop watching, and none of the big country sponsors (in enough numbers) are going to stop participating. So there is no incentive to ban Israel from participating whilst they commit genocide to their neighbours.
Money talks.
Stayed at home apparently. He was scared he would look bad… 😬
Wait a second. This is a meme community so I assume you’re joking but… don’t you lot have paid sick leave or parental leave?
Universal free health care.
Have you tried to destroy a Nokia 3310?. Case closed.
Tony Stark
[bums], [boobs], [other]
As much as I loathe Cooper and hope that she is banished from politics, this is a rather specious fluff piece from Novara Media. The donations were fully declared, over a ten year period during which mostly she was out of office and wasn’t even the health secretary.
A terrorist group from the Republic of Ireland are threatening “migrants” (anyone darker in skin tone than they are)
Not sure they’ve seen the amount of fake tan and dodgy eyebrows they’ve got going over there. “Anyone darker than they are” must be legitimately pulling all mass and even light towards them!
The polls go straight in the… bin.
Andy Burnham: No.
Are Senators exempt from laws in the US? Given how easily this can be disproved why hasn’t he been sued to the point of bankruptcy?
That kinda depends on where in the world you are. In Europe we have strong protections such that users need to consent to that type of testing (remember those annoying cookie banners? well what do you think they’re for 😉). But if you’re in the US… well, my apologies.
Randomised is not what makes it ethical. It’s what makes the AB test statistically valid such that you can test your hypothesis.
Ethical would be to run the test, gauge the click through rate to checkout to find a winner, then for all those you charged the higher price to give them a discount code such that everyone gets the product at the same price. What you’re testing is the click through rate of a price advertised further up the funnel.
Maybe later you can say ok the rates didn’t drop off people seem ok with the higher price. Higher price for all. Or not as the AB test would reveal.
Sounds like that Camilla Batmangella Kids Company charity that was caught fiddling the books instead of caring for children.
Ireland is not part of the UK. They’d be very upset, rightly so, if you even suggested they are.
This post has nothing to do with the UK.
Let’s not get fixated on the employment part. There’s also not being in further education. And also not being in training (like an apprenticeship for example).
If you could identify a child that would later on in life struggle to either be in further education or training you’d help them, right?
The solution is more resources per child with constant evaluation and alteration of the system and what it offers, it really is that simple.
That sounds like what this is aimed at doing. Did you read somewhere that all they are doing is putting kids on a naughty list?
Without knowing what they plan to do with children that are identified it is hard to say much more. But the point of school, surely, should be to prepare children for their future such that they can function in a society.
Imagine what you would be doing if you’re later in life classed as being Not in Employment, Education, or Training for anything (what is known as NEET). That doesn’t sound like a very fulfilling life. Giving people extra help such that they can go onto further education, or training for a skill (even if you take umbridge to the word employment) is surely a good thing.
What would you have happen to these children? If you could identify clear markers at an early age?
I decided, against my better judgement, to actually read past the headline 😉.
This follows on from some research that indicates kids are three times more likely to fall into unemployment after they leave school based on some indicators at an early age. So the idea is that these children get extra help to make sure they don’t end up in a lifetime of joblessness. Wouldn’t this be similar to spotting kids that are struggling with English or Maths at an early age to help them before it is too late?
Somehow according to Lemmy this is a bad thing 🤷
Seems like the government can means tests these payments but is unable to means test the triple lock. Odd.