ComradeSharkfucker

He/They

“There were two “Reigns of Terror,” if we would but remember it and consider it; the one wrought murder in hot passion, the other in heartless cold blood; the one lasted mere months, the other had lasted a thousand years; the one inflicted death upon ten thousand persons, the other upon a hundred millions; but our shudders are all for the “horrors” of the minor Terror, the momentary Terror, so to speak; whereas, what is the horror of swift death by the axe, compared with lifelong death from hunger, cold, insult, cruelty, and heart-break? What is swift death by lightning compared with death by slow fire at the stake? A city cemetery could contain the coffins filled by that brief Terror which we have all been so diligently taught to shiver at and mourn over; but all France could hardly contain the coffins filled by that older and real Terror—that unspeakably bitter and awful Terror which none of us has been taught to see in its vastness or pity as it deserves.” - Mark Twain

  • 413 Posts
  • 6.07K Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: July 7th, 2023

help-circle







  • ComradeSharkfucker@lemmy.mlBannedBanned from communitytoLemmy ShitpostYou okay babe?
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Haha, you should try using the median income to adjust for outlier skewing. Also while it is true that constant capital becomes variable capital if you follow the production chain you should keep in mind that much of this production is done in the imperial periphery (and therefore not necessarily reflected in GDP per capita). Their exploitation is directly responsible for the purchasing power of our wages, in a way an hour of our labor purchases many many hours of theirs. If you are going to eliminate constant capital through the means suggested in your process, then you need to include the wages of workers of the periphery (often below the value of their labor power) in your average.





  • ComradeSharkfucker@lemmy.mlBannedBanned from communitytoLemmy ShitpostYou okay babe?
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Okay so I was gonna respond sooner but I was super baked and unable to answer this when I saw it last night.

    You should read Wage Labour and Capital by Marx for some added context, it is short.

    Basically the value of a commodity is calculate by c + v + s. c being constant capital (the value of the means of production that has been degraded to create the commodity, hard to calculate without good info), v is the amount of paid labor (variable capital), and s being surplus value is the unpaid labor.

    To calculate the value of your labor all you need to know is the constant capital used to produce whatever commodity you produce and the value of said commodity. By including your wage as v you can calculate the surplus value and then compare them to see what share of the value you produce you actually recieve.

    It gets harder when you aren’t directly producing commodities which my friend was.









  • ComradeSharkfucker@lemmy.mlBannedBanned from communitytoLemmy ShitpostYou okay babe?
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Sheesh, if that doesn’t radicalize someone idk what does. Granted in your case a lot of that value comes from the constant capital of the plant itself but still, it is likely you make less than 6% yeah. My friends was easy to calculate because constant capital was relatively negligable.