• @venusaur
    link
    English
    245 months ago

    It’s because the leaders aren’t the ones fighting the battles or being targeted. They’re playing chess somewhere far from the violence.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      55 months ago

      We should just solve conflicts by throwing the presidents or monarchs of the opposing countries in an arena to fight to death.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        13
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        I think it’d be better if we disregarded highly authoritarian leaders in general and embraced socialism. Back in the day, kings and emperors fought their battles, but it didn’t make their feudalism any less… feudal.

          • @jorp
            link
            English
            35 months ago

            Humans cooperated and formed large confederations long before capitalism and liberalism were ideas.

            It’s true that unequal and selfish organisations have often consolidated power and squashed other organisations but we’ve also seen humanity going the opposite way many times before.

            To shrug our shoulders and say humans are inherently greedy so socialism can’t work is a cop out. We’ve dismantled unequal power structures many times before and we can do it again

      • @lightnegative
        link
        English
        5
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Let’s say your country was about to be invaded, your house stolen and you sent elsewhere or killed so that citizens of the invading country could occupy your house and your land instead.

        And all of that not happening was hinged on the physical prowess of an old guy who’s probably been in politics for decades.

        How helpless would you feel?

      • @samus12345
        link
        English
        3
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        [T]he ministers and generals of the two countries, dressed in bathing-drawers and armed with clubs, can have it out among themselves. Whoever survives, his country wins. That would be much simpler and more just than this arrangement, where the wrong people do the fighting.

        - Kat, All Quiet on the Western Front

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          3
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          "Sorry ole chap, turns out all those cigars didn’t do Churchill any favors. Hitler took him out in under a minute.

          Anyway, we heard you’re gay, so here’s a bullet in your ear."

          • @samus12345
            link
            English
            25 months ago

            Yeah, but the US has a guy in a wheelchair!

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              15 months ago

              Good point, the Allies would have been in trouble. Meth head Hitler vs Stalin would have been interesting.

      • @venusaur
        link
        English
        15 months ago

        That would be interesting. We’d definitely have to shift who we elect towards more violent leaders tho, and idk how I feel about that haha.

      • @venusaur
        link
        English
        15 months ago

        That’s where they practice haha