Complete bullshit. Regimes that punish whistleblowers harder than war criminals reveal themselves as dreaming of tyranny.

The entire trial was cooked, and I’m furious :(

That non parole period is nuts too, pure revenge. What danger does this man represent? If he’s out on the streets some war criminals better watch their backs?

edit: I should add, it’s also quite frustrating that at the end of all this top brass has had no light shone on them, which was his initial goal on leaking. He thought the SAS was being investigated overmuch as a distraction from leadership failures. I guess we’ll never know. A slap on the wrist for the executioners, no systematic investigation, and an inconvenient man in gaol.

  • @[email protected]OP
    link
    fedilink
    68 months ago

    Yeah nah, the highest calling is ensuring integrity. Everything else must come second to that or there will be none, and if the military cannot conduct itself in a trustworthy manner then it cannot be trusted and loses the privilege of secrecy.

    If individual soldiers are endangered then it is the military who endangered them, not the person blowing the whistle.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      -38 months ago

      Yeah unfortunately nothing is infallible and it’s better in my opinion to keep a fucked up secret then have 10 men die so we can be open and honest all the time

      • Zagorath
        link
        fedilink
        English
        68 months ago

        it’s better in my opinion to keep a fucked up secret then have 10 men die

        wtaf

          • Zagorath
            link
            fedilink
            English
            28 months ago

            I honestly don’t even know how to respond to someone saying they would rather have 10 people die because of keeping a fucked up secret than have an open and honest society. Like seriously that’s just beyond the pale.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              18 months ago

              I’m saying it’s better a fucked up secret is kept than 10 people die not the other way around

              • Zagorath
                link
                fedilink
                English
                38 months ago

                Ok, but that’s not what your earlier comment said. It’s quite the opposite of your earlier comment.

                Anyway, even if we do take it that way, as others have said, it just doesn’t work that way. Keeping these secrets is enabling more deaths to occur. The “fucked up secret” was “people are getting away with murdering noncombatants and prisoners and covering it up”. By revealing this “fucked up secret”, McBride was helping to save lives.

                Ironically, this is kinda what you seemed to be acknowledging in your earlier comment. You said that keeping the secret leads to deaths (“keep a fucked up secret then have 10 men die”).

            • @[email protected]OP
              link
              fedilink
              18 months ago

              I think often when people think of other people dying they internalise it as a headline does. Such and such died, ok that’s sad I guess.

              I think the correct way to interpret it is to take the death of the person you have been the closest to ever. All that pain and grief and rage, multiply that by the number of people expected to feel that per person, then by the number of people dead. you start to interpret pointless, preventable, or cruel deaths with the appropriate amount of madness-tinged grief then.