• @RustyNova
    link
    34
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Inb4 normies force us to change well established terminology just to appease their fragile souls

    Like git’s main and master

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        107 months ago

        Right? It’s less letters and it’s pretty clear.

        I haven’t found a good action neutral replacement for “black list” yet though. “Deny list” and “block list” are too action-specific.

      • @agelord
        link
        -2
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        I started using git after everyone switched to main from master, so I don’t care about the change. But, the change in itself is a red flag.

      • voxel
        link
        fedilink
        6
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        tbh i think “master” terminology is only bad if paired with “slave”. the word itself kinda just lost it’s original meaning
        but I don’t really care about git’s change. im only using master out of habit

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        67 months ago

        “Okay Todd, looks like Steve is working on auth, so you’ll be on the blacklist today-… ahah I mean, working on the blacklist today ahem…”

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      07 months ago

      Oh yeah that was a shitshow. I made a point to keep “master” in my repos and configurations because it’s the other meaning of master - one of the many others. Words are allowed to mean different things, ya know? If I’m drinking some coke I’m certainly not drugging myself (…I hope).

      After all, the command to attach to a master is not “git slave”, it’s “git pull”.