• Drusas
    link
    fedilink
    77 months ago

    Doesn’t there have to be a conviction in order for there to be a pardon? Or is that a myth?

    • Chainweasel
      link
      English
      97 months ago

      Nixon got a full pardon and I don’t think he was ever charged.

    • @Professorozone
      link
      -1
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      That’s what I was going to say. Pretty sure it’s true. I read something a while ago about people who had been pardoned, not realizing that it’s an admission of guilt. I think a person can even turn down a pardon on that basis, but I’m not positive on that last part.

      I guess Biden would have to say he WOULD pardon him, to head off any charges.

      • @kryptonianCodeMonkey
        link
        8
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        None of that is true. Nixon was never charged, let alone convicted of any crimes. And pardons can be completely general and not even specify an explicit crime at all. President Ford’s pardon of Nixon, for example, was for “all offenses against the United States which he, Richard Nixon, has committed or may have committed or taken part in during the period from January 20, 1969 through August 9, 1974” So, no. Neither charges or convictions are required, nor even a crime at all.