• @WhatIsThePointAnyway
    link
    English
    368 months ago

    I’m sure this was killed by bitchy socially conservative sheltering types who freak out about anything that doesn’t fit in their small minded view of morality.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      57 months ago

      Lemmy is full of those people too, there’s a whole thread of them angry that openI might allow NSFW content.

      • @barsquid
        link
        English
        47 months ago

        Oh, they must remember the threads discussing finding child pornography in the image generation model training data.

      • @Jomega
        link
        English
        -117 months ago

        God forbid people have concerns about ethics.

        • @WhatIsThePointAnyway
          link
          English
          8
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          No one forces you to stare at the girl. People see offensive shit every day all over, but society doesn’t conform to all offenses equally, does it? Why is your ethics enforceable, but other people’s aren’t? Why does she have less right to practice her ethical choice to expose her body (assuming by your answer you would have offense)? Why is it more ethical to have others right to view taken away than for you to simply turn your head away? Ethics is very subjective, especially when there is no direct harm to either party.

          • @Jomega
            link
            English
            37 months ago

            Are we talking about the same thing? I replied to someone taking about OpenAI, not porn in general. The creation of porn without the consent of the people fed into the program is nothing short of an ethical nightmare, even in cases where said people are pornstars. You’re painting me as a repressive for shit I didn’t even say.

            • @WhatIsThePointAnyway
              link
              English
              2
              edit-2
              7 months ago

              It looks like you were responding to my comment

              “I’m sure this was killed by bitchy socially conservative sheltering types who freak out about anything that doesn’t fit in their small minded view of morality.”

              That’s how it showed up. If you were responding to a different comment, my bad, please disregard my comment. Sometimes the line system in Lemmy is a tad hard to follow.

              Edit: realize I misread the line scheme and you weren’t responding to me. Sorry.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -37 months ago

            It is against the law. That means that society, as a whole, has decided that this is immoral.

            No one forces you to stare at the girl

            So that means that its morally okay to kill everyone who looks at me (“No one forces then to look at me!”)?

            Why is your ethics enforceable, but other people’s aren’t?

            Because ethics are only enforcable through laws and the laws currently enforce “my” ethics in that regard.

            Why does she have less right to practice her ethical choice to expose her body (assuming by your answer you would have offense)?

            Whether that is morally right is an ethical question but would you say the same about a minor (exposing themselves)?

            Ethics is very subjective

            Exactly, so what is the issue with the company having moral concerns about it and shutting it down?

            • @WhatIsThePointAnyway
              link
              English
              2
              edit-2
              7 months ago

              Because seeing a nipple is on par with murder. Not to mention society makes all sorts of terrible shit ethical, like billionaires bribing politicians to subvert the will of the people. My point was ethics is a subjective defense at best. Especially when no harm is perpetrated on either party and nipples being required to be covered was not an ethical standard most of human history. Murder would cause harm to the murdered party. Nipple viewing would only harm a child because they have been taught that nipples are “supposed” to be hidden like a dirty secret. Even though all mammals suckle from them in early life. It’s absolutely silly to make a bare chest being exposed such a big “ethical” deal and people should be questioning this like I did. It only exists due to the puritanical religious idealism pushed on society. It has no basis in reality as a detriment to society.

    • Poplar?
      link
      English
      -107 months ago

      Doesn’t necessarily have to do with conservatism. Not everyone wants to be randomly flashed without consent.

      • @WhatIsThePointAnyway
        link
        English
        197 months ago

        Oh the terrors of non-consensual nipples entering your line of sight. The beach must be horrifying for you, unless only women’s nipples require “consent” to be exposed. Social conservatism is the entire reason breasts have to be hidden like dirty sexualized secrets to begin with. It’s silly.

        • Poplar?
          link
          English
          37 months ago

          deleted by creator

        • Poplar?
          link
          English
          07 months ago

          Yes a fair comparison.