• @QuaternionsRock
    link
    English
    -1
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    It doesn’t do that, either. LLMs retain the linguistic patterns found in textbooks, nothing more. It’s remarkable that they can do so much with this information alone, but it’s still a far cry from genuine intelligence.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      15
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      And yet they can spit out copyrighted material verbatim, or near-verbatim, how strange and peculiar.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      14
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Yeah, even setting aside the intelligence claims, I know I’d be feeling a lot more positive about LLMs as a fun theoretical tool if they weren’t being sold as personal assistants or search engine replacements etc, which even the apologists here admit they’re really really bad at.

      (Also I’d argue “linguistic patterns” is pushing it. “Textual patterns” more like, it’s not supposed to have any idea about grammar or even about what “text” is.) (I say “supposed to” because who knows what sort of hacks they’re running under the hood.)

      • @QuaternionsRock
        link
        English
        28 months ago

        Yeah I completely agree with you there. I really don’t like the way AI is being monetized and commercialized; it all just seems poised to go terribly. Ideally there shouldn’t be any incentive to overstate the capabilities of these models, as doing so just makes everything worse.