• Captain Aggravated
    link
    fedilink
    English
    47 months ago

    Even over dial-up it was a matter of minutes. Like y’all were downloading mp3s and not WAVs, right?

    • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet
      link
      English
      3
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Probably about 9 minutes for an average song over a 56 kbps connection, without disconnects or hangs. Unfortunately it rarely stayed connected without hangs and stutters, so it ended up taking a lot longer than the math suggests it should. I didn’t have a good computer though, nor good Internet. I was using some bargain basement eMachines computer. It wasn’t until a few years later that I built my first PC. If you didn’t disable automatic updates on Windows or other programs, then those downloads could end up hogging 90% of your bandwidth for the entire time you were away.

      • Captain Aggravated
        link
        fedilink
        English
        07 months ago

        How shit does the computer have to be where the machine’s performance itself is a factor in p2p torrenting? Like, if it can run Limewire, it should be fast enough where the only relevant bottleneck is the pipe to the internet.

        Internet speed and reliability of both host and client are a factor though; downloading something rare where there’s only like one guy in Burundi seeding it could take centuries.

        • @Lawnman23
          link
          English
          27 months ago

          https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Softmodem

          Softmodems were painfully CPU intensive vs a hardware/controller-based modems. A slow Celeron proc, as found in most eMachines of the time, was already chugging to keep 98/Me going with everything else.

        • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet
          link
          English
          1
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          Oh wait! Reading your response just jarred my memory a little. I’m not even talking about Limewire, I’m talking about Napster! Lol.