The problem is, yes government could and I would argue should be more democratic. But that isn’t how Leninism/stalinism/Maoism works. We have problems with adequate representation with two parties. Those groups want only one. And traditionally that party doesn’t take kindly to dissent. Rather than listening and adjusting policy to better address people. They simply exclude you from society if you’re lucky. Lock you up, brutalize you. And if they don’t think they’ve adequately broken you, kill you.
We need to remove authoritarian and private control of government. Capitalism would follow eventually. The problem is. That’s impossible with capitalists and ML alike.
I’d be happy with a social democracy that emphasizes a mixed economy with strong social welfare programs funded by progressive taxation. Examples include the Nordic countries (Denmark, Finland, Norway, Sweden).
I don’t know how to accomplish that though because the farther we slip into a class dictatorship, the harder it will be to enact progressive taxation. We’d all vote yes to tax the 1% richest more, but that will never be on any ballot for us to choose.
That would absolutely be a great start. But only that. A starting point.
Taxing the rich can be on the ballot. The problem is we often spend too much time fighting amongst ourselves letting the ownership class walk away with everything while we tussle over scraps. They’ve succeeded in putting a large portion of the population into a nihilistic Fugue state. Only trying to destroy things and hurt the group they’ve been told is the Boogeyman. Not improving things for themselves or others. As easy and as fun as it can be to ridicule conservatives importantly thought out plans and ideology. We need them. And they need us. If we want to make anything better that is. We need to break through the cynicism and nihilism and convince them that there is a way for things to be better.
The problem is, yes government could and I would argue should be more democratic. But that isn’t how Leninism/stalinism/Maoism works. We have problems with adequate representation with two parties. Those groups want only one. And traditionally that party doesn’t take kindly to dissent. Rather than listening and adjusting policy to better address people. They simply exclude you from society if you’re lucky. Lock you up, brutalize you. And if they don’t think they’ve adequately broken you, kill you.
We need to remove authoritarian and private control of government. Capitalism would follow eventually. The problem is. That’s impossible with capitalists and ML alike.
I’d be happy with a social democracy that emphasizes a mixed economy with strong social welfare programs funded by progressive taxation. Examples include the Nordic countries (Denmark, Finland, Norway, Sweden).
I don’t know how to accomplish that though because the farther we slip into a class dictatorship, the harder it will be to enact progressive taxation. We’d all vote yes to tax the 1% richest more, but that will never be on any ballot for us to choose.
That would absolutely be a great start. But only that. A starting point.
Taxing the rich can be on the ballot. The problem is we often spend too much time fighting amongst ourselves letting the ownership class walk away with everything while we tussle over scraps. They’ve succeeded in putting a large portion of the population into a nihilistic Fugue state. Only trying to destroy things and hurt the group they’ve been told is the Boogeyman. Not improving things for themselves or others. As easy and as fun as it can be to ridicule conservatives importantly thought out plans and ideology. We need them. And they need us. If we want to make anything better that is. We need to break through the cynicism and nihilism and convince them that there is a way for things to be better.
It’s not a small task by any means.