@[email protected] to [email protected] • 6 months agoNato’s failure to save Ukraine raises an existential question: what on earth is it for?www.theguardian.comexternal-linkmessage-square18fedilinkarrow-up119arrow-down152
arrow-up1-33arrow-down1external-linkNato’s failure to save Ukraine raises an existential question: what on earth is it for?www.theguardian.com@[email protected] to [email protected] • 6 months agomessage-square18fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink12•6 months agoNATO? Better to ask what is the UN for? They should have a standing army ready to slap down dictators and genocidal maniacs if they step out of line.
minus-squareLorindóllinkfedilink15•6 months agoUN will remain powerless as long as the permanent security council members have veto right. It never should have been introduced.
NATO? Better to ask what is the UN for? They should have a standing army ready to slap down dictators and genocidal maniacs if they step out of line.
UN will remain powerless as long as the permanent security council members have veto right. It never should have been introduced.