• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    396 months ago

    I work in stone conservation and for the body that dictates these regulations, even if it was built out of stone it would be required to be visually distinct. The only exception is if it were reinstatement of an original feature that had been demolished or decayed to the point that it had to be removed and fully rebuilt. In that case every effort should be made to source the stone from the same quarry, and the same mortar mix should be used.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      116 months ago

      An easy way to do that is make the addition not flush, or use a different kind if masonry. The linked documentary includes an interview with the local planning council who recommended finding a local architect with expirience to do it.

      Instead the chrap English bastard just used the cheapest options he could find in Essex and wore the council down to approve this monstrosity.

      • @mojofrododojo
        link
        English
        66 months ago

        I’d call this ‘malicious compliance’.

    • @someguy3
      link
      -26 months ago

      That’s not what I meant.

        • @someguy3
          link
          8
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          Even if it went from grey stone to grey plastic siding, you could tell when it goes from stone to plastic. That should be enough to meet their “different” criteria, but not be such an outrageous eyesore.