cross-posted from: https://lemmy.zip/post/15863526

Steven Anderegg allegedly used the Stable Diffusion AI model to generate photos; if convicted, he could face up to 70 years in prison

  • @sxt
    link
    English
    44 months ago

    If the model was trained on csam then it is dependent on abuse

    • @Darrell_Winfield
      link
      English
      254 months ago

      That’s a heck of a slippery slope I just fell down.

      If responses generated from AI can be held criminally liable for their training data’s crimes, we can all be held liable for all text responses from GPT, since it’s being trained on reddit data and likely has access to multiple instances of brigading, swatting, man hunts, etc.

      • @laughterlaughter
        link
        English
        24 months ago

        You just summarized the ongoing ethical concerns experts and common folk alike have been talking about in the past few years.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      194 months ago

      As I said in my other comment, the model does not have to be trained on CSAM to create images like this.

    • @Jimmyeatsausage
      link
      English
      14 months ago

      That irrelevant, any realistic depiction of children engaged in sexual activity meets the legal definition of csam. Even using filters on images of consenting adults could qualify as csam if the intent was to make the actors appear underage.