• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    59 months ago

    I posted this in another thread but there are some applications where this display technology is actually needed. For example with VR/AR having a 1000Hz display would mean each frame is only displayed for 1ms. Being that quick would mean the headset would be able to better display the micro movements your head and body makes which inturn reduces the disconnect and motion sickness people get with VR/AR.

    • @mojofrododojo
      link
      English
      49 months ago

      yes, but, it reduces the computation cycle for that frame to 1ms.

      as a dev, that’s daunting.

    • @SkyezOpen
      link
      19 months ago

      90hz is generally enough for most people to not get motion sick. Some headsets do 120 which is like 8ms frame time. Humans can barely detect a flash of light that lasts for that long.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          3
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          This is a demonstration of latency, not frame rate. Did you intend to link something different?

          • @chonglibloodsport
            link
            49 months ago

            A 1000Hz display necessarily has a latency of 1ms between frames. For 100Hz, that’s 10ms.

            But this is only the lower bound. You have to include all other sources of latency, such as software, input hardware, drivers, graphics card, etc.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              2
              edit-2
              9 months ago

              Ahhh, now I see the connection! It’s the update interval. I had to chew on it for a minute but the math checks out.