• archomrade [he/him]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    77 months ago

    It’s the over-the-top sarcasm and insincere indignation that galls me

    Then they’ll inevitably try claiming that yea, it’d be nice if we had someone with better politics but NOW’S NOT THE TIME TO MAKE A FUSS

    • @PugJesusOP
      link
      English
      -77 months ago

      insincere indignation

      Yeah, how dare those uppity minorities get agitated over the prospect of becoming legally second-class citizens or outright murdered. If only we knew our place, quietly accepting the Principled Stand of the Privileged in our honor!

        • @PugJesusOP
          link
          English
          -107 months ago

          Yeah, I’ve never denied the sarcasm. Sorry that you find tone policing more important than genocide.

          • archomrade [he/him]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            117 months ago

            Idk really seems like a stretch too suggest your impassioned defenses of the guy supporting the genocide is an indication of your outrage

            • @PugJesusOP
              link
              English
              -87 months ago

              “Wow, I don’t understand how you can defend the guy who doesn’t want to commit genocide in the US, and is less gung-ho about the ongoing genocide in Gaza than the opposition?”

              It’s weird. I know, I should apparently support all genocide, everywhere, as often as possible, to be a good leftist according to these new standards, but for some reason, I keep gravitating towards the “Let’s not start up death camps in the US and run sorties over the West Bank and ensure as many Ukrainians are murdered as possible” option.

              Very strange, I know, seemingly incomprehensible to the Very Serious Leftist Brigade here on Lemmy.

              • archomrade [he/him]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                127 months ago

                What’s strange is that the totally-different-and-very-cool party keeps finding themselves in situations wherein they’re totally forced into committing atrocities themselves, but end up being OK because somehow there’s someone worse right behind them

                And it’s never actually their fault because there’s just too many people who support their totally unavoidable atrocities and if they don’t do them they’ll lose to the totally-worse-and-different monster party

                And the people who totally oppose the atrocities have no choice but to support the party conducting the atrocities because if they don’t, more atrocities will be done by the totally different and bad party and maybe actually against them and not the faceless foreigners they can forget about

                So strange

                • @PugJesusOP
                  link
                  English
                  -97 months ago

                  What’s strange is that the totally-different-and-very-cool party keeps finding themselves in situations wherein they’re totally forced into committing atrocities themselves, but end up being OK because somehow there’s someone worse right behind them

                  Yes, definitely, what’s going on is the Democratic Party decided to commit atrocities out of the blue. This definitely isn’t a long-standing US policy that was, until very recently, widely supported on all sides of the electorate. Wow, it’s a good thing politics are something simple that Manicheans with short attention spans can learn by half-paying attention to news reels for a month, otherwise we’d really be fucked, wouldn’t we?

                  • archomrade [he/him]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    77 months ago

                    And it’s never actually their fault because there’s just too many people who support their totally unavoidable atrocities and if they don’t do them they’ll lose to the totally-worse-and-different monster party

                    This definitely isn’t a long-standing US policy that was, until very recently, widely supported on all sides of the electorate.