The Supreme Court upheld a pro-Republican South Carolina congressional map Thursday, rejecting the argument raised by civil rights groups that lawmakers impermissibly used race as a proxy to bolster the GOP’s chances.

But the high court also said that the civil rights groups that challenged the maps could continue to pursue one part of their claim, a move that will likely delay the battle over the districts for months.

With state election deadlines approaching, a federal court in March had already ruled that South Carolina could use the contested map in this year’s election.

The decision was 6-3 along conservative-liberal lines.

      • @CaptainSpaceman
        link
        106 months ago

        Well… if the area is ~45% dems and they are represented with 1 district out of 7, then they have ~14% representation.

        3/5 of 45% would be ~27% representation, but currently they have just over 3/10

          • @CaptainSpaceman
            link
            14
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            I didnt whoosh at all, im showing how the dems representation is HALF that of the 3/5 compromise for this given area

            • @wjrii
              link
              English
              106 months ago

              For the non-Americans in the thread, it’s worth pointing out that the 3/5 compromise didn’t give slaves representation at 3/5 the normal level, it gave the slaveowners overrepresentation in congress based on counting every 5 slaves as 3 additional people for apportioning the House of Representatives by population. The southern states wanted full “representation”, while the northern states wanted zero, but the latter would have been better – allowing that abolition was not on the table – because it would have diluted southern influence in the lower house of Congress.

              • @CaptainSpaceman
                link
                46 months ago

                Thanks for adding the context, I forget how global this platform is sometimes