“I expect a semi-dystopian future with substantial pain and suffering for the people of the Global South,” one expert said.

  • @ammonium
    link
    English
    27 months ago

    Here you go, you’ll need numpy, scipy and matplotlib:

    from scipy.optimize import curve_fit
    from matplotlib import pyplot as plt
    
    # 2010-2013 data from https://ourworldindata.org/renewable-energy [TWh]
    y = np.array([32, 63, 97, 132, 198, 256, 328, 445, 575, 659, 853, 1055, 1323, 1629])
    x = np.arange(0, len(y))
    
    # function we expect the data to fit
    fit_func = lambda x, a, b, c: a * np.exp2(b * x ) + c
    popt, _ = curve_fit(fit_func, x, y, maxfev=5000)
    
    fig, ax = plt.subplots()
    ax.scatter(x + 2010, y, label="Data", color="b", linestyle=":")
    ax.plot(x + 2010, fit_func(x, *popt), color="r", linewidth=3.0, linestyle="-", label='best fit curve: $y={0:.3f} * 2^{{{1:.3f}x}} + {2:.3f}$'.format(*popt))
    plt.legend()
    plt.show()
    

    Here’s what I get, global solar energy generated doubles every ~3.5 (1/0.284) years.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      17 months ago

      Thank you! That does look like a great fit.

      So that’s just solar, then? Long term, it does seem like the one that’s the biggest deal, but right now there’s also a lot of wind and hydro in the mix, so that’s another point in favour of the assumptions here being conservative.

      • @ammonium
        link
        English
        27 months ago

        Yes, just solar. Hydro is bigger now, but it doesn’t have the growing potential. Wind is currently also growing exponential, but I don’t see it doing that for 20 more years. And even if it does, it doesn’t really make a big difference since exponential + exponential is still exponential. If it grows as fast as solar that would mean we’re just a few years ahead of the curve.