• @blazera
    link
    English
    -186 months ago

    Consider that endorsing an awful candidate in Biden will help get Trump elected.

    • @glimse
      link
      English
      116 months ago

      How the hell did you come to that idiotic conclusion?

      • @blazera
        link
        English
        -66 months ago
        1. You dont even like your candidate, why should i come to your side instead of you come to mine?
          • @blazera
            link
            English
            16 months ago

            whichever side we support stands a chance of winning. They aint gonna compete in a game of skill in November, they’re gonna ask us who wins and we decide.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              16 months ago

              Yes, “we”, consisting of statistically significant factions of the voting population. Campaigns take time and money, neither of which any candidates besides the two front-runners have enough of to be competitive. They’re not gonna ask you who wins, you don’t decide. I don’t see 70 million Americans shifting to anyone else at this stage.

              • @blazera
                link
                English
                26 months ago

                you’ve got a paradox going where me supporting a better candidate is pointless because my vote is worth nothing and I cant change anything.

                but also that I have to support your candidate because my vote matters if its for them.

                my vote matters and I’m giving it to a better candidate.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  2
                  edit-2
                  6 months ago

                  Is it a paradox to say that driving in circles around a roundabout is pointless because it doesn’t get you anywhere, but driving along the route to a destination does? Driving is driving, does it work or not? Paradox! Smearing food on your belly doesn’t satisfy your hunger, but eating it does. Does food satisfy hunger or not? Paradox!

                  If we had approval or ranked choice voting, voting third party would accomplish something. Since we have First Past the Past elections, voting third party is as effective as smearing food on your belly or circling a roundabout for hours.

                  • @blazera
                    link
                    English
                    -16 months ago

                    Its pretty irritating everytime someone brings up ranked choice voting. They know its a good thing, they want it to happen. But its getting brought up to try and criticize my choice of candidate. You want ranked choice voting? You know who supports ranked choice voting in their election platform? My candidate! I am well aware of how shit FPTP voting is, Im not the one promoting it.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  26 months ago

                  Don’t forget that it’s not ok to vote for your candidate because they don’t already have enough support, therefore there’s no way to ever reach the threshold where it’ll be ok to vote for them.

                  It’s only ok to vote for the neolibs that the billionaires approve after a promise that nothing’s really going to change.

                  Even in a state that’s so blue the Dems have no chance of losing, voting for or writing in someone left of the incumbent will still be deemed a vote for the red team.