• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    86 months ago

    Only one explicitly right wing 3rd party was even an option in 2020, and Jorgensen ran libertarian, which is an ideology conservatives as a whole tend to reject. As evidenced by the ~1% of the vote she got.

    this isn’t true

    Are you sure about that?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        7
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        Yeah, about 1% of the voting body. The point that conservatives don’t vote for a third party stands with a margin of error within 1%.

        Contrast that to the 8 other independent or left leaning third parties on the ballot in 2020.

        You’re trying to shut down my original point with a counter point that is both moot and also trying really hard to be made on a technicality.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            76 months ago

            What you said is technically correct, while ignoring the context.

            Being technically correct about something that doesn’t change the overall picture and hailing it as the end of an argument is petty and dishonest.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                7
                edit-2
                6 months ago

                Congratulations. You’ve proven me wrong that an inconsequential, literally marginal number of conservatives vote 3rd party.

                That in itself doesn’t change my original point.

                Here’s your award for being technically correct 🎖️

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    7
                    edit-2
                    6 months ago

                    Gee thanks officer. I stated something that was correct to within 99% of my claim and cited a source. Good thing you were there to correct the remaining 1% for the poor readers out there who might have mistaken that error as significant