• ThrowawayOnLemmy
    link
    English
    801 year ago

    Same for public freakout. Some people feel you need to ‘seed’ a community with a bot and content… Seems dumb to me, copying everything from somewhere else. But it doesn’t really bother me all that much

    • @executive_chicken
      link
      English
      51
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I think it’s important in the beginning to help generate content and have people stay in the community. Reddit would oftentimes have a subreddit with an interesting topic, but no content which pushes people away almost immediately

      • @Stovetop
        link
        English
        341 year ago

        I will say it seems to be working. It’s only because of the posts created by the bot that this community even appeared on my local feed, which helped me realize that there was a TIL community in Lemmy I could subscribe to.

      • @LordOfTheChia
        link
        English
        111 year ago

        Also theres the “1% of users generate all the content”. It may take a bit for that 1% to get pulled into the community. Gotta keep that 99% entertained somehow in the mean time.

    • @jimmyjoners
      link
      English
      221 year ago

      Is this not effectively a link aggregation site? Why do you care if the links are bespoke human entered data? People keep bitching about this and it makes no sense to me at all

      • @LordOfTheChia
        link
        English
        151 year ago

        I think it’s an important difference if the bot posts are grabbed from (say the all time top posts from that sub in Reddit) vs reposting from the same Lemmy community.

        One helps preserve a historical top posts for others to enjoy if the primary community goes dark (or the image/video hoster link expires), the other just adds annoying repetitiveness.

    • The Quuuuuill
      link
      fedilink
      English
      91 year ago

      It’s what some people want. Its not what I want. I’m happy both groups get to have what they want