@[email protected] to [email protected] • 7 months agoExcellentlemmy.caimagemessage-square42fedilinkarrow-up1382arrow-down146
arrow-up1336arrow-down1imageExcellentlemmy.ca@[email protected] to [email protected] • 7 months agomessage-square42fedilink
minus-square@disguy_ovahealink-1•7 months agoMy digestive, cardiac, and nervous systems don’t seem to care about the law very much. Lol
minus-square@disguy_ovahealink0•7 months agoAre you citing a toxicological review? Your comment read to me like a case argument.
minus-square@AProfessionallinkEnglish2•7 months agoYou know exactly what I said. “X has toxic chemicals” How much chemicals? Because toxicity is a result of a dosage.
minus-square@disguy_ovahealink0•7 months agoThat’s a good question. You should consider substantiating your dismissal of concern with a verified toxicology report. Until then, my initial claim of being “laden with chemical treatments” stands as accurate, as supported by a credible source.
My digestive, cardiac, and nervous systems don’t seem to care about the law very much. Lol
Toxicologists study human health not law…
Are you citing a toxicological review? Your comment read to me like a case argument.
You know exactly what I said.
“X has toxic chemicals”
How much chemicals? Because toxicity is a result of a dosage.
That’s a good question. You should consider substantiating your dismissal of concern with a verified toxicology report. Until then, my initial claim of being “laden with chemical treatments” stands as accurate, as supported by a credible source.