It’s extremely wasteful. Animals lose most calories they intake through energy loss. Its better to grow plants and feed them to ourselves than to breed and kill. Would you be fine breeding and killing humans? Whats the morally significant difference?
Your different approach to ethics doesn’t make the killing acceptable. It’s wrong either way.
killing animals for food is good, actually.
It’s extremely wasteful. Animals lose most calories they intake through energy loss. Its better to grow plants and feed them to ourselves than to breed and kill. Would you be fine breeding and killing humans? Whats the morally significant difference?
the difference is that they are human.
Why is that a morally significant trait? What makes a human a human?
say what you want to say. I don’t care for your Socratic interrogation.
Go vegan
i don’t see any good reason to do so.
To stop enabling carnism
once the animals have consumed the calories, it’s wasteful not to harvest them. killing animals for food is good.
Killing animals is unnecesary
most people don’t do that but the people who do would probably disagree with you.
Doesn’t make it okay or acceptable. Same with other social issues 100 years ago. Glad we know where you’d stand
your insinuation is intellectually dishonest.
It’s a fact of changing the status quo
It’s better to let them live a happy life free of exploitation than to kill them because someone wants a burger.
cows aren’t killed for burgers. they’re killed for profit.
For their product, meat. Factory farming would exist in a communist society as well if carnism is still a popular belief system
so?
It’s immoral to mass breed and murder animals just as it would be to do the same to cats or dogs.