More animals die if you pay for them, especially over the course of a month, year, or your lifetime of perpetuating death and sexual autonomy violations
Using metrics of population of humans, animals slaughtered, and their products consumption. Regardless it’s better to use a line of caution when causing unnecesary harm rather than habitualizing a series of actions for decades. Billions a year is such a high number most people cannot conceptualize. Trillions if you include fish but they’re mostly caught rather than farmed. Still encourages trawling though
You contribute directly to 200+ by not being vegan a year. Just because others support it doesn’t mean you should or they should.
no, I don’t. regardless of what I buy, more animals are killed every year
More animals die if you pay for them, especially over the course of a month, year, or your lifetime of perpetuating death and sexual autonomy violations
I don’t think the rate of increase could be any higher than it is, and I don’t believe my choices impact that.
Your belief doesn’t stop you from encourging it objectively.
how could we even test whether the rate could have increased more? it’s not even a testable hypothesis.
Using metrics of population of humans, animals slaughtered, and their products consumption. Regardless it’s better to use a line of caution when causing unnecesary harm rather than habitualizing a series of actions for decades. Billions a year is such a high number most people cannot conceptualize. Trillions if you include fish but they’re mostly caught rather than farmed. Still encourages trawling though
so how do you set up the experiment?
Once again, it’s approximation based. Most of economics is theory. “Prove gravity is real.”
You don’t have to be apart of the statistics, you can choose compassion
I am compassionate.
Not if you support mass farming and murder
no one supports murder
Many people do by voting with their wallet.
that’s not a real thing.
It is with supply and demand, it encourages growth