Kristie Pereira said she’s tried to get Beau back after learning he was never euthanized but said the rescue organization she got him from has refused to rehome the dog with her.

Exhausted and short on options after consulting two veterinary clinics, Kristie Pereira made the gut-wrenching decision last year to take her desperately ill puppy to a Maryland shelter to be euthanized.

So she was stunned last week to find the dog up for adoption at the same pet rescue organization where she had gotten it.

Calls to the shelter confirmed that her dog had not been euthanized after veterinarians there didn’t think he needed to be. The shelter instead called Lost Dog & Cat Rescue and turned the puppy back over to them.

The rescue confirmed that Friday in a written statement, giving an extensive timeline showing that its veterinarians found no neurological issues with the dog. After tests diagnosing a liver problem and a $7,000 surgery — paid for through a GoFundMe campaign — the dog was declared healthy.

  • citrusface
    link
    English
    488 months ago

    This is a bad take my dude. I can assure you this an agonizing choice she needed to make and I’m sure her heart is broken. I’ve worked in rescue for a hot minute - I’ve seen this - it’s not easy at all., for anyone involved.

    • @pete_the_cat
      link
      English
      68 months ago

      I volunteered at a shelter for two years and it’s definitely easy for some people (those that don’t give a fuck about animals): I was volunteering there one day and this guy came in with a happy and healthy looking Samoyed and said “I want to have her put down, she bit my kid”. Luckily the shelter refused to do so.

    • @tsonfeir
      link
      -568 months ago

      She didn’t want to pay for the surgery. Someone else did.

      My. Dude.

        • Alto
          link
          fedilink
          278 months ago

          Not reading the article and being aggressively confidently incorrect is basically this guy’s MO

          • @tsonfeir
            link
            -358 months ago

            She can pay $7k and get the dog back.

            • TWeaK
              link
              fedilink
              English
              228 months ago

              She offered exactly that, they refused. Hell, even to begin with she was willing to pay the $12,000 she was originally quoted, but was told there was a very slim chance that it would be successful and that euthanasia was the best course of action. The shelter even coached her into putting the dog down.

              You really should read more before you run your mouth.

              • @tsonfeir
                link
                -248 months ago

                If she was willing to pay, why did she not? The shelter is crap clearly, but the place she took it to to put it down was another place who clearly felt different. It’s a different owner now. It’s up to them.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  148 months ago

                  I know you’re not going to read the article, but you could at least read the comment you’re replying to, because it contains the answer to your question.

                  • @tsonfeir
                    link
                    -178 months ago

                    I read it. Not the comments. New owner owns the dog 🤷‍♂️

      • citrusface
        link
        English
        328 months ago

        Correct because she was told by multiple parties to not do the surgery and euthanized. She followed vet, rescue, and shelter recommended advice - then the shelter fixed the dog and she’s offering to pay for the surgery that she didn’t know would save its life.

        Also, I wasn’t trying to be a dick. I apologize for the way I addressed you.

        • @tsonfeir
          link
          -428 months ago

          When she pays $7k, and the new owner agrees to give up the dog, she can have it back.

          (Apology accepted😘)

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            138 months ago

            Maybe you can apologize for being so rude without knowing what’s going on? They apologized to de-escalate but clearly you’re just going to use that as a reason to keep being a jerk

              • Norgur
                link
                fedilink
                98 months ago

                The content of the fucking article, mr. smughead.

                  • Norgur
                    link
                    fedilink
                    118 months ago

                    The shelter diagnosed the liver thing, started a GoFundMe, treated the dog and then put it up for adoption instead of telling the grieving owner one wird about any of this. Instead of doing their fundraising, getting new owners and such, the previous owner said she would have happily paid for the procedure and taken her dog back home. That’s what you are missing. It’s really clearly written out in that article, so…

      • Norgur
        link
        fedilink
        198 months ago

        You didn’t read the article and act smug nonetheless, my. Dude.

        • @tsonfeir
          link
          -318 months ago

          She can pay $7k and get the dog back.

            • @metallic_substance
              link
              218 months ago

              I’m convinced he’s just not literate enough to make it through a whole article with so many big boy words

            • @tsonfeir
              link
              -238 months ago

              Because the new and rightful owner refused. As the should.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        178 months ago

        She didn’t want to pay for tests that she was told were unlikely to do any good anyway. She said she is willing to pay them back for the surgery.

        RTFA.