Thousands of children could die after court backs campaign group over GM crop in Philippines, scientists warn

Scientists have warned that a court decision to block the growing of the genetically modified (GM) crop Golden Rice in the Philippines could have catastrophic consequences. Tens of thousands of children could die in the wake of the ruling, they argue.

The Philippines had become the first country – in 2021 – to approve the commercial cultivation of Golden Rice, which was developed to combat vitamin A deficiency, a major cause of disability and death among children in many parts of the world.

But campaigns by Greenpeace and local farmers last month persuaded the country’s court of appeal to overturn that approval and to revoke this. The groups had argued that Golden Rice had not been shown to be safe and the claim was backed by the court, a decision that was hailed as “a monumental win” by Greenpeace.

Many scientists, however, say there is no evidence that Golden Rice is in any way dangerous. More to the point, they argue that it is a lifesaver.

  • capital
    link
    English
    1
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Populations have been surviving in the Philippines for millennia without the need for a proprietary spliced rice enriched for Vit A.

    This has a real, “Back in my day, we kids didn’t have these newfangled car seats and we lived!” vibe to it.

    From the article:

    Vitamin A is found in most foods in the west but in developing countries it is conspicuously lacking in diets, a deficiency that “is associated with significant morbidity and mortality from common childhood infections, and is the world’s leading preventable cause of childhood blindness,” according to the World Health Organization. Estimates suggest it causes the deaths of more than 100,000 children a year.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      07 months ago

      Low vitamin A intake in the Philippines is primarily due to the lack of vitamin A-rich foods in the diet, particularly among low-income populations. Factors contributing to this include:

      1. Economic Constraints: Limited financial resources restrict access to diverse and nutrient-rich foods such as animal products (liver, eggs, dairy) and vitamin A-rich fruits and vegetables (carrots, sweet potatoes, dark leafy greens).

      2. Dietary Habits: Traditional diets may not include sufficient amounts of vitamin A-rich foods. Staples like rice and fish, while important, are low in vitamin A.

      3. Agricultural Practices: Local agricultural practices might not prioritize the cultivation of vitamin A-rich crops due to various socio-economic and environmental factors.

      To address this, an introduction of non-GMO crops that are rich in vitamin A and unlikely to become invasive could be considered. One such crop could be carrots. Carrots are rich in beta-carotene, which the body converts into vitamin A. They are:

      • Non-invasive: Carrots have controlled pollination, typically requiring insects for cross-pollination, thus reducing the risk of becoming invasive.
      • Adaptable: They can be cultivated in a variety of climates and soils, making them suitable for different regions.
      • Nutrient-dense: A good source of vitamin A, they can help improve dietary intake.

      Other potential crops include sweet potatoes (particularly the orange-fleshed varieties), which are also high in beta-carotene and have similar advantages regarding non-invasiveness and adaptability.

      Now the only thing I see as a barrier is that instead of waterlogged clay soil, carrots need Sandy well drained soil instead.

      Honestly, if the Golden rice wasn’t under a patent (free or not) and wasn’t likely to cross pollinate, I’d be all for it. But at this point I’d sooner the state or NGOs help instituting an egg a day policy over trying to hammer something in that might do more harm than good, more meddling, and may make a poor nation indebted to patent-coloinalism by the Swiss.

      • capital
        link
        English
        3
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        What do you do for a living and why do you think you know better than those closer to the problem?

        By the way, this looks at least partially written by a LLM.