• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    87 months ago

    And you can recognize that there are multiple problems with different severity and need to be adressed from most severe to lowest severe.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      3
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Awful aggro to someone just pointing out a simple fact. They never said we don’t need to address large vehicles, or even that they shouldn’t be the first thing addressed. They’re simply pointing out that these aren’t a perfect golden bullet to the issues that plague cities, and we need to be aware of the downsides to any potential solution, and be willing and able to make the changes necessary to then fix THOSE issues. I don’t expect nuance, though, everything is a dichotomy online.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        07 months ago

        Awful aggro my ass, you cunt.

        But jokes aside: I interpreted the comment like they put teens on ebikes and our car favoring infrastructure on the same level. Those two problems are so far apart, that I think that my response isn’t too harsh, or even ‘Awful aggro’ (That’s an awfully aggro interpretation of my comment, by the way).

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      27 months ago

      Sure, but I’m responding to a comment that is suggesting they aren’t a problem. We don’t have to turn a blind eye to all other problems just because we think one is biggest.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -77 months ago

      Well since we can’t ban cars, the most severe problem, then I guess we can’t do anything. Good job defending the status quo I guess.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        57 months ago

        Your list of ideas what we actually can do is pretty short, we obviously need to spread more information. Good to know, thanks.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          17 months ago

          You are right, banning private cars for only a few streets would be a great success for any city.

          Lower hanging fruits would be to allow bikes to drive in both directions in one way streets, put some asphalt on cobble stone streets, get an inner city speed limit of 30 km/h, use many zebra crossings, design narrower streets (the narrower the street, the faster a driving person feels, without going faster), remove parking space in the inner city and make cars park outside of the center,…

          Many many things that should be done before even starting to try to regulate ‘rude teens on ebikes’ with idiotic ideas presented here (driver license for ebikes?!)

          The fast ebike problem would solve itself with an infrastructure that stops favoring cars and starts to seperate pedestrians and bikes with the gained space.