Exclusive: Experts say changes to Grand Mosque of Shadian mark completion of five-year sinification campaign
  • Flying SquidMEnglish
    1•6 months ago

    It’s really not hard to go through a conversation chain.

    https://lemmy.world/comment/10300436

    But I notice you ignored all the stuff about the source being far right, so I’m guessing none of this actually matters to you anyway.

    • @TokenBoomerEnglish
      1•6 months ago

      I care about the facts and the truth, not the source, as should you.

      But I notice you ignored all the left-wing sources I provided that demonstrates the new areas in China are populated and not “ghost cities,” so I’m guessing none of this actually matters to you anyway.

      • Flying SquidMEnglish
        2•6 months ago

        This is what you said which started this conversation:

        I was just reading about it. It’s another web encyclopedia trying to incorporate other encyclopedias to compete against Wikipedia’s biases.

        I showed you that the whole thing is about Wikipedia not having a right-wing bias.

        I thought you cared about facts and truth?

        • @TokenBoomerEnglish
          0•6 months ago

          I do. I admitted Justapedia was a biased source:

          Edit: I read through the [page](https://justapedia.org/wiki/Fascism) on Fascism. It’s crap, runaway.

          but the references linked were credible.

          I’ll admit when I’m wrong, will you?

          Five studies, including two from Harvard researchers, have found a left-wing bias at Wikipedia:

          • A Harvard study found Wikipedia articles are more left-wing than Encyclopedia Britannica.
          • Another paper from the same Harvard researchers found left-wing editors are more active and partisan on the site.
          • A 2018 analysis found top-cited news outlets on Wikipedia are mainly left-wing.
          • Another analysis using AllSides Media Bias Ratings™ found that pages on American politicians cite mostly left-wing news outlets.
          • American academics foundconservative editors are 6 times more likely to be sanctioned in Wikipedia policy enforcement. source
          • Flying SquidMEnglish
            2•6 months ago

            When did I say Wikipedia didn’t have a bias? Please quote me.

            Again, if you care about the truth, you’ll show where I made that claim that you think you’re refuting.

            • @TokenBoomerEnglish
              1•6 months ago

              Maybe I misread it. I’m not concerned with winning an argument, only with correcting the misinformation about “ghost cities.” I did that. Now I just have to wait for Legoland Sichuan to open in 2025 in the new state-level are of Tianfu. Hopefully it won’t be too crowded, since it’s a “ghost city.”

              • Flying SquidMEnglish
                1•6 months ago

                “Maybe” you misread what?

                I never claimed Wikipedia had no bias. I never even implied it.

                You berated me for not caring about facts and truth, then you lied about me, now you won’t even admit it was a lie.

                • @TokenBoomerEnglish
                  1•6 months ago

                  I continually try to de-escalate, and disengage. And you continue to antagonize and misrepresent my intent.

                  Take a breath. I’m not worth the amount of energy you’re putting into this.

                  • Flying SquidMEnglish
                    2•6 months ago

                    Well, it seems you don’t actually care about facts and truth.