• streetlights
    link
    4
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    I’m confused about this. Striking is used as a means to bring the employer/government to the negotiating table, but there is no government until after the election, so what’s the point?

    • @NocturnalEngineer
      link
      149 months ago

      It’s targeted to bring the issue to the forefront of people’s minds before they vote.

      They’re not trying to negotiate with the current government, they’re trying to gain support from the people voting the next government in, hoping they’d vote for a party sympathetic to their cause.

      • streetlights
        link
        -39 months ago

        I’m not entirely convinced that strike action should be used in this way. It’s too easy for the Tories to point at the docs and blame them for waiting times going up.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          79 months ago

          Yes, but nobody believes them. They trust the doctors more. So, the Tories blaming them would backfire to the doctors advantage,

          • streetlights
            link
            -19 months ago

            I’m not sure “nobody believes” them, you and me might but the general population is a broad spectrum. Waiting times for routine appointments are already at an all time high and some of that is due to industrial action, this proposed strike will make that worse.

            Striking is an important tool for workers to be used as a last resort to bring an employer to the negotiating table. That’s not the case here, there is no “employer” as such until after the election, so what’s the point? Simply ‘raising awareness’ is a pretty poor justification.