• @Koba
    link
    11
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    afaik it’s not only for google chrome but for chromium in general. so privacy friendly browsers like brave and degoogled chromium are also affected unless they fork the chromium project or something.

      • umami_wasabi
        link
        fedilink
        14
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        In terms of web engine, there are Gecko(Mozilla) and WebKit(Apple) for you to chose from, which isn’t that much choice.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          257 months ago

          I use Mozilla every single day and have done so for about 6 years now. Personally I don’t feel like I’m missing out on anything but ads if I don’t a Chromium based browser.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            37 months ago

            I’ve been using Mozilla products for going on 20 years on my windows PCs, and other than websites arbitrarily deciding they don’t work on non chrome browsers, I’ve rarely had issues.

        • JackGreenEarth
          link
          fedilink
          English
          157 months ago

          Yes, and Mozilla browsers are an viable alternative. What’s the issue?

          • umami_wasabi
            link
            fedilink
            2
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            It is viable, just lack diversity in terms of web engine. Web tech today are just too complex to have another web engine. Even Microsoft ditch its EdgeHTML and favor Blink, the engine used by Chromium-based browsers.

    • @iopq
      link
      47 months ago

      You already have to fork the chromium project to make Brave and degoogled chromium

    • Madis
      link
      fedilink
      1
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Some Chromium browsers like Brave and Vivaldi already announced they’ll extend it for as long as they can, and when they no longer can’t, they’ll think of something else like improve their own blockers.