The title says it all!

  • @weaponGOP
    link
    English
    5
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    We may not all think alike or obtain the same Linux ISOs. I am okay with that and feel we all should be okay with differing opinions and viewpoints, especially in a secular society.

    I defended the comedian Dave Chapelle and questioned the term “toxic masculinity” in 2 posts which lead to a long (and apparently scrutinized) comment history.

    • Night Monkey
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Based comment history. If I had any invites left I would have given it to you. I can’t stand people who stalk people’s comment history. It’s friggin stupid

      • @weaponGOP
        link
        English
        34 months ago

        Thanks. We reached that dystopian part where people are judged based on their social credits and “likability” and conformance index to the masses.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        I expect to be held liable for people I invite to other people’s places, therefore I don’t invite randos or people that have proven to have little regard for others.

        • @weaponGOP
          link
          English
          44 months ago

          Invitations and referrals do carry liability. However, I would say that if you have a differing opinion, others attack with little regard. The “mob mentality” is inert and affluent in social media. Then you are left to defend your differing viewpoint, leaving a trail of more dissenting comments which are also attacked to the nth degree. I honestly thought this federated experiment would be different. I was wrong.