Blunt tools shouldn’t be used for complex real-world things. Other examples would be mandatory sentencing in courts (you should let the judge assess the particular situation), or things like “I don’t go out with guys under 160cm” (you should get to know him).

Just because someone is in their 70s, doesn’t mean they can’t lead. Not with any certainty. In some cases it does, but the political process should have the flexibility to deal with each case.

Look at Deng: he was mid-70s to mid-80s when he was in power and he improved the lives of 10⁸ or 10⁹ people.

  • z3rOR0ne
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -3
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Might I suggest you leave Lemmy then, as Lemmy was created by a communist, or did you not know that? Not just lemmy.ml, mind you. Lemmy the software.

    I mean, stick around if you want, but if you’re going to complain about communism on a communist founded platform, that’s like me going on Truth Social or Twitter and spouting antifascism. I’m gonna get some hate in those circles. Just saying.

    • @Everythingispenguins
      link
      English
      36 months ago

      I didn’t see them say anything about communism, he arguing against authoritarianism and the killing of people with different opinions.

      For the record then are you saying that you support the oppression of the students and other protesters at Tiananmen Square?

      • @[email protected]OP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        06 months ago

        This thread is getting sidetracked.

        We can debate the various pros and cons of Deng in particular as a leader, but he generally has a good reputation (even the website you linked says so) and the point is about leaders in their 70s and 80s in general rather than him in particular.