• @Linkerbaan
    link
    -2
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    The general usage refers to people who are so brainwashed that they will ardently deny and even defend massive crimes against humanity committed by their government. In the case of China, deniers of Tienanmen or the Uyghur Genocide would apply. In the case of America anyone that denies israel is committing Genocide applies.

    And the glorious leader supporting that Genocide is none other than Genocide Joe Biden.

    • @drislands
      link
      47 months ago

      Interesting. I’ve legitimately never heard of the word being used in any context other than what I described. Thank you for sharing.

      I still feel weird calling Biden a tankie, though I do see where you’re coming from.

        • @drislands
          link
          3
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          Oh wow, that’s pretty definitive. Looks like the meaning I’ve understood is correct – according to Wikipedia at least (which I tend to trust).

          @[email protected] what do you think? It looks like you may be misusing the term.

          • @Linkerbaan
            link
            -27 months ago

            I think the term does not mean what it meant a long time ago as even the Wikipedia article states that there’s already like 7 definitions of it. The original definition is not even related to the Tank Man which is its most popular reference these days.

            After the Prague Spring, the term was used to describe Communist party members of Western countries who had supported the invasion of Czechoslovakia

            I see no reason to for the arbitrary limitation to only call Communists Tankies as we could also start a semantics discussion that China and Russia aren’t exactly communist countries anymore.