• OsaErisXero
    link
    fedilink
    236 months ago

    I was under the impression that the glass was actually better, since the cans require a plastic lining to not ruin the beer and the bottles can either be recycled and reused as-is after a wash or ground up and remelted with little/no loss in quality.

    • bluGill
      link
      fedilink
      76 months ago

      The plastic lining is for soda - beer tends to be less acidic and so doesn’t need it. (at least in general)

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      66 months ago

      Cans must be recyclable as well as they come with a deposit and many people return them to recycling centers.

      • @KISSmyOSFeddit
        link
        15 months ago

        But they aren’t reusable, which is always the preferable option.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      36 months ago

      The lining in question is very thin (akin to a layer of paint) and just burns up when the cans are re-melted.

      Recycling beer bottles is indeed pretty easy once you get them to the processing center intact, but it’s getting there that’s the hard part. They’re fragile, pretty heavy and don’t stack well unless you put them in some form of packaging.

      Once they’re broken, they’re basically useless; glass isn’t recycled much except as grit material for sandpaper; re-melting it is resource-intensive and sensitive to impurities.

    • @badcommandorfilename
      link
      -116 months ago

      There’s no plastic in an aluminum can. Both glass and aluminum are almost totally recycled into their base materials. Aluminum is lighter to transport to and from the recycling facility.