• @BigPotato
      link
      English
      719 months ago

      DOD doesn’t want to pay upkeep and it was designed for roadside bombs in remote mountains not Iranian drones.

      Might as well give it to the cops, in case one of their supporters accidentally hits it while trying to bomb a women’s shelter or something.

      • @Madison420
        link
        English
        269 months ago

        They’re specifically not to be used on roads because they don’t fit, rollover if sneezed at and destroy our roads but fuck it they’re police right?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            79 months ago

            I dunno, it might have to “monster truck” its way over all the other motor vehicles already parked in the bike lane.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          79 months ago

          I’m confused about the design. If it’s designed for mountain areas but is top heavy and rolls easy, isn’t that a major design floor for an area where the terrain is likely to be steep from left to right in parts?

          Maybe my idea of terrain in mountainous areas is wrong.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            59 months ago

            It’s designed to stay on roads.
            Those roads are natural choke points where bombs are often hidden on the ground, which results in a high and heavy design.

            • @Maggoty
              link
              English
              39 months ago

              MATV begs to differ. We always had the technology. We just wanted a cheap solution to stop taking so many casualties.

            • @Madison420
              link
              English
              29 months ago

              Correct, they move slow but they are quite explosion survivable past the original design.

          • @Maggoty
            link
            English
            49 months ago

            You have correctly identified one of many reasons the military hated these.

          • @BigPotato
            link
            English
            29 months ago

            Tall but narrower than other options while having survivability in case of getting IED’d. I know HMMWVs are actually big but the MRAPs didn’t all have a much larger footprint.

            Fun fact though, they had to add a gunners harness because the gunners were more likely to die in a roll over. Armored plates all up over your back but you get crushed because the Specialist driving hasn’t even driven anything bigger than his Civic and doesn’t have enough hours dealing with actual Afghan roads.

        • @BigPotato
          link
          English
          19 months ago

          Hey, you can easily get them up to 50mph on an airfield runway and feel the death rattle telling you to slow down. It’s basically all operator error.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      39 months ago

      Is it “gifted” to them, or are they paying taxpayer dollars to purchase these war machines? When they’re turning our local communities into war zones, some of us might even question whether we should reduce their funding significantly if this is what they’re squandering our money on.

      Watch them cower inside of this vehicle, idling in the parking lot as a school shooter empties one magazine after another.

      • @jordanlundM
        link
        English
        69 months ago

        They pay little to nothing to get them, then they pay everything to keep, maintain, and store it. As someone else noted, looks like it’s already leaking oil.

      • @Maggoty
        link
        English
        39 months ago

        They pay very little for it. Essentially shipping.

          • @Maggoty
            link
            English
            19 months ago

            Title of your sex tape our government’s entire domestic agenda…