While Ezra was taking a nap in his crib, the family’s Husky that they owned for eight years attacked out of nowhere.

“And to just bring awareness that it could be any dog at any time. Completely unprovoked, no matter what the history is,” Chloe said.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    -107 months ago

    Yes, semantics, I get it.

    You need things strictly defined for you but aren’t willing to provide parameters or ask questions.

    You built a sand castle and then knocked it down all by yourself.

    Very impressive.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      47 months ago

      Saying two conflicting things in the same statement isn’t semantics. It’s evidence that the author is a putz.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        -17 months ago

        Whether two statements conflict with one another is a function of what those statements mean which is also called “semantics”.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        -57 months ago

        Oh, so you’re interpreting certain words to mean something different than their intention?

        Like your choosing to define a word differently than someone else?

        Isn’t there a…word…for that…

        Oh, semantics, got it, good thing you connected the dots there.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          57 months ago

          Like your choosing to define a word differently than someone else?

          No? I’m giving you the benefit of the doubt, assuming you know English, and interpreting them as written. There’s not a whole lot of room for interpretation there.

          Though I am starting to wonder if maybe I gave you too much credit

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            -47 months ago

            If you don’t understand that one word can have multiple definitions, I’ll agree that your assumptions may be giving you trouble.

              • @JigglySackles
                link
                37 months ago

                Lol it does to incels, maybe this one is an incel.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                -37 months ago

                Don’t think anybody asked you about that word in particular, but at least you’re crawling toward an understanding.

                Just for fun, “no” can semantically refer to 1) a discreet or broad lack of; or 2) an imperative command to avoid a particular action, but you probably knew that and were being semantically facetious, otherwise you would look like you done goofed up real hard.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  17 months ago

                  Go look up the definition of stupid and pretend that’s what I said about your argument. No need for semantics or nuance just take it at face value I’m sure it’s accurate enough as is

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    -17 months ago

                    I agree with you, we could define your arguments as stupid on their face without much further analysis.

                    In one sense of the word, anyway.