Current prerelease is 1.2.5

1.2.4 is the first to introduce experimental Wayland support. Especially on KDE Plasma there are supposed to be some issues.

Lets test!

Why?

Regular RDP/VNC programs are hard to use in real scenarios, as they rely on IP addresses. RustDesk is easier as it uses a Rendezvouz server that can also be selfhostet or reimplemented.

  • @aksdb
    link
    84 months ago

    They also document scripts to bootstrap clients on other OSses. And I don’t think you need Pro to build rustdesk yourself - they even document the process.

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      114 months ago

      To be fair, the APGL requires to publish code that is compilable. So giving instructions is pretty relevant for more complex projects.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        2
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        They don’t define what ‘compilable’ means though (among many other things), and it’s pretty easy to come up with several different definitions of it that not everyone will agree with.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      14 months ago

      The one big thing they do hide behind Pro though, is authentication for the server side. With the free version, if your server is open to the internet, then anyone who knows the IP can use it to relay their clients as well.

      • @aksdb
        link
        24 months ago

        They still need to know the key. If you publicly distribute your config, that’s a problem. But IMO one even the pro version couldn’t solve.

    • @TCB13
      link
      English
      -3
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      The point is that under Windows you can change the App name to set credentials and other settings like this:

      rustdesk-host=mydomain.tld,key=eiu5pzFYlr5nY9i9yJp9smzzLnvx4XNX7O3SaNhkWS8=.exe
      

      But under macOS you can’t do it… just because they don’t want to.

      • @aksdb
        link
        34 months ago

        The apps are bundled completely differently on OSX and Linux. It’s technically not possible to do the same thing there. Also this is not a free/paid limitation at all.

        They could maybe build a packaging tool that can customize the binaries (adding data to the PE executable in Windows and maybe a property file in OSX and Linux); but that’s quite some effort for not much gain.

        • @TCB13
          link
          14 months ago

          Under macOS it’s trivial to change the name of the application package without messing with other aspects of the packaging.

          • @aksdb
            link
            14 months ago

            If it’s so easy to implement, go ahead and open a PR. The community will be thankful.

          • @aksdb
            link
            14 months ago

            I said it’s possible, just much more effort than the current solution which only requires reading and and parsing the process name on startup.