• @undergroundoverground
      link
      English
      116 months ago

      As wonderful a sweeping statement as “the left have lost their mind” (said no one who would ever vote left ever) is, its pretty laughable that anyone thinks the corporatist reform party would ever actually lower immigration.

      I mean, literally all of the left leaning parties have said they will lower immigration but don’t let that ruin the narrative.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -116 months ago

        I have exclusively only voted left actually.

        The left aren’t doing enough, the Tories have proven they haven’t done enough. That’s why reform makes sense because it sends a message about how much immigration needs to be reduced.

        • @undergroundoverground
          link
          English
          66 months ago

          Course you did and it’s their fault youre voting farrage too…

          “Da left” haven’t done anything at all, seeing as they haven’t been in power for over 2 decades. Thats why your claim makes no sense.

          Oh, it makes you send a message alright. Although, its not the one you think you’re sending.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -16 months ago

            Why would I lie about voting for the left?

            I have economically left views. But it’s I don’t think the left are planning to do enough.

            There is nothing wrong with anything I said. Just you can’t accept people have different opinions to you so all you think is that I must be lying.

            • @undergroundoverground
              link
              English
              15 months ago

              To normalise the idea that people who once voted "for the left ^^^tm " now voting for a hard right reform party. Because you’re bored. Because it seemed funny. Who knows, why does anyone lie?

              So, as “the left” aren’t meeting your left wing economic planning expectations, you decided to go with a party who have NO left leaning economic plans. Well, id love to hear how you plan to square that circle.

              Of course I can accept that people have different opinions to me. What a silly thing to say. No, sadly, its that it sounds like bollocks and it doesn’t hold up to any scrutiny, is all.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                15 months ago

                Of course it holds up to scrutiny. You are just close minded.

                I, and probably most left wing people throughout history, have had economically left views and want low immigration. I don’t know why you can’t accept that.

                The left aren’t doing enough, or talking about doing enough, about immigration. So as such I have to make a decision. What’s more important, kinda crappy left views that in my opinion don’t go far enough. Or deal with immigration.

                Immigration is such a big issue that the left are losing voters like me to parties that will do something about immigration.

                If there was a left party talking about immigration as much as reform and was polling the same I’d vote for them. But right now the big issue is immigration and I want that solved. I’m willing to take a economic hit achieve that. But I also think lowering immigration is good for the economy and the workers in it. So I get to vote for 2/3 things I want rather than 1/3. There does that basic maths help you understand now? It’s really not hard.

                • @undergroundoverground
                  link
                  English
                  15 months ago

                  My mind is open. Its just youre taking a load of bollocks, is all. Its really not my fault you’re trying to sell these whoppers.

                  I’ll show you how it doesn’t hold up:

                  Exaclty who are “the left” here and what isn’t going far enough, that reform has gone far enough on? Don’t be light on the detail or just declare wide sweeping BS and you should find the root of the problem.

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    15 months ago

                    https://metro.co.uk/2024/06/04/this-top-parties-election-say-immigration-20967177/

                    Labour has some vague promises about controlling borders. Great doesn’t really say anything at all does it? Doesn’t sound like immigration is going to come massively down.

                    Greens: No barriers to prevent or deter asylum seekers wanting to come into the UK. Scrap minimum income and language requirements for visas.

                    Brilliant. We have people already coming to the UK that won’t integrate now we are going to bring in people that can’t even speak English.

                    Do you actually care what plaid, SNP or any of the NI parties have to say? They are largely on labours level.

                    Reform

                    Focus on ‘the immigration election’ Stop the boats’ (with a six-point plan) Freeze all non-essential, ‘unskilled’ immigration (excluding care workers)

                    You must be able to see how reform are talking about doing more about immigration right? You can’t be that thick.

                    You must be able to see voting for reform comes across more as “the UK wants less immigration” than voting for greens or labour.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      96 months ago

      Assuming you’re not trolling. Can you please expand on what good points do you think they offer?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -66 months ago

        Getting rid of FPTP and doing absolutely anything about immigration rather than just acting like it isn’t an issue.

        Everything else is secondary.

        • @WormFood
          link
          English
          116 months ago
          1. almost every major political party in the UK has an anti-immigration stance, so they certainly do act like it’s an issue
          2. despite media scaremongering about immigration, there’s no credible evidence that immigration in the UK has negative social or economic consequences overall
          3. the lovely people behind reform UK previously campaigned for us to leave the EU in order to reduce immigration, and not only did it not reduce immigration but it was also a multi-year political shitshow (and it tanked the economy, and it pulled us out of the EU human rights convention, and it fucked up supply chains, and it decimated arts and science funding, etc etc)

          to be honest I’m kind of amazed that UK voters would fall for the same obvious grift twice

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            36 months ago

            Dumb people will double down in an attempt to present they were always right, even after they admit they were sort of wrong. If they can reverse that previous loss into a win, they were always right.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -56 months ago
            1. Yet they aren’t going far enough.

            2. People have been so horrifically mislead on this it’s unbelievable. It’s true immigration as a whole can be “good” (what good is, is debatable) but it also isn’t wrong to say that it could be good to reduce immigration. Not all immigration is the same and not all amount are the same, grouping it together messes the whole thing up. The purpose of immigration as it is now now is to keep wages down and keep houses prices up.

            Do you really care about GDP do you even really care about GDP per capita? Probably not but those figures are used to woo you. What’s better having a GDP per capita of 50,000 and rent of 40,000 or having a GDP per capita of 30,000 and having rent of 10,000? With lower rents people have more discretionary income and they can go out spend more, grow the economy and it will create growth. Everyone wins. Currently all our money is going to landowners and business owners. Immigration is for them not for us. So you say we need more X workers. Okay pay people enough to do it. They aren’t trained? Pay for training it’s not hard it just costs money. It’s not like the UK is at 100% employment rate people want to work but can’t. It’s cheaper to get immigrants to do it, but its bad for the UK.

            Look at Japan low immigration, low house costs, low crime. They manage to fill their jobs. Yet Japan is doing something wrong?

            Let’s get some facts and figures. Here is an article about UK losing money to immigration.

            https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2024/05/08/migration-failed-economic-growth-made-housing-crisis-worse/

            Here is Danish data on crime.

            https://inquisitivebird.substack.com/p/the-effects-of-immigration-in-denmark

            Why are we taking in people that are taking British people jobs costing the country money and committing more crimes than locals?

            I voted remain, I’m happy to have immigration. But what it is now and what it is used for is wrong. You really think net migration of over half a million people per year is good? Why is that happening?

            That’s not even to mention the cultural aspect. I love Britain and I love how it is. But I am also very well travelled and the place I most felt like an outsider and been stared like I don’t belong is within the UK. Why are we doing that to ourselves? If we take a financial hit to train our workforce, give them jobs and keep our culture I’m happy to do it. Give us the choice. But I actually think financially the people will be better off at the expense of the upper class. They why we don’t get to choose.

            1. Brexit was a shower of shit. Yea. Boris pushed for it and then had the power to do something about it. He’s one of the most evil politicians in the UK. Fuck him. Brexit was a vote for less immigration, it’s not the peoples fault or even UKIPs fault that immigration didn’t go down.

            Whatever happened then doesn’t mean we don’t have issues now.

        • Echo Dot
          link
          fedilink
          English
          5
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          If you want to get rid of first pass in the post there are less repugnant parties than Reform. Especially considering the fact that their only MP got in the position because he was too racist for the Tories and he was only in the Tories because he got kicked out of Labour.

          So their one main representative is a man who has no morals and cannot be trusted to tell you the colour of the sky with any degree reliability.

          I said this the other day and I’ll say it again because it’s a point that people such as yourself seem unable to gork. If they win, they will win under first pass the post, instantly removing any incentive they would have to get rid of it. Given their tendency to lie in order to get what they want, I would be extremely skeptical of anything they promise.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -16 months ago

            You comment is entirely based on the assumption I think voting for Reform will lead to reform being in power.

            Farage is a slimeball but, like it or not, he is one of the most influential British politicians of our time. I hated him for Brexit but when it cones to FPTP and reducing immigration Reform clearly stands out as the party that is most likely to cause an change in those issues. I don’t think they will manage it themselves but voting for then shows what people care about and it continues to raise awareness. Voting for Green sounds like a vote more for green policies (which I am all for but I think the momentum is underway and there is no stopping it). Why would I vote libdem? I could vote Plaid which is closer to my left leaning views but I think we need more of a UK wide focus on immigration.

            Who else should I vote for or what have I missed?

            • Echo Dot
              link
              fedilink
              English
              26 months ago

              A man who has never once won a political position is an influential politician now is he? Lord save me from armchair political pundits. He’s not influential, he’s just scary to the conservatives, who by the way are not going to be in power anymore so he’s going to lose any kind of authority that you perceive him to have had.

              Labour are way more likely to listen to anything the greens have to say. Reform won’t be scary to labour because they’re not going to lose votes to them.

              But feel free to go vote for the racist party and if they gain any MPs it will be your fault.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                06 months ago

                Brexit is the biggest thing to have happened to the UK in recent history.

                You think that would have happened without him?

                • Echo Dot
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  16 months ago

                  Like I said he’s threatening to the conservatives he isn’t politically relevant overall.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -1
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            I have voted green before but I don’t think they care enough about immigration. I think the economic boom in green energy means that the landslide to green power is already underway and effort should be spent in other areas. No one is really going to slow or speed up the green revolution from a global point of view, which is frankly all that matters?

            Why would I vote for libdem?

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              1
              edit-2
              6 months ago

              Why would I vote for libdem?

              Because they want to get rid of FPTP and fix immigration, your main two important issues. But it seems like you’re adding extra steps now…

              Anyways, reading your other comments here, you’ve confirmed what others already suspected - you don’t really want to fix the root issues of immigration, you’re just a xenophob.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                05 months ago

                I’m not adding extra steps at all. I want a party that will do something about immigration and voting. Reform seem the loudest in that space so they are likely to get my vote.

                You are the one trying to convince me to vote libdem and I don’t see what they offer. The party has never interested me and I don’t see why I would vote for them. So if you can’t give me a reason to choose then over reform I don’t see why you would bring it up.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  15 months ago

                  I don’t know if it’s your reading comprehension or you’re just confused, but I urge you to re-read my comments - I’m not trying to convince you of anything, you clearly made your decision and it doesn’t seem to be based on any empirical evidence.

                  You made some bold claims though and I’m here to challenge you on those.

                  • You claim to be a “leftie”.
                  • You voted remain.
                  • You want to reform FPTP and immigration.
                  • Apparently reform are the only ones to hit all the boxes.

                  So my answer is this… If you vote Reform, you’re not a leftie. If you vote Farage, you’re not a Remainer either. There are other parties who want to reform voting and immigration with better track record, actual councillors and more humane policies.

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    05 months ago

                    Well what makes someone a leftie? Because it seems we have different views on what that is and I’m letting you lay down the groundwork on that. I don’t mean parties I mean as a concept. What cote views make someone left vs right?

                    Sure if you vote for a right party then I can see how that by definition can make you right. So if I vote right then yes I will be for the first time in my life right. (All other times I voted for a left party and I think my core right/left views are left. Just few exceptional views could override others and make me vote for a party that holds views I don’t agree with).

                    In the Brexit vote I voted remain. What more can i say?

                    I didn’t say reform hit all the boxes. You tried to convince me to vote for someone else and I asked why I should vote for them.

                    I voted for other left leaning parties in the past because of voting reform issues. As for immigration I think reform are talking about it more and the publicity on the issue is bigger. Therefore voting for reform does more for the immigration issue than any other.

                    I’m really struggling to understand what you don’t get.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      66 months ago

      Reform aren’t a real political party. Real political parties have to reveal who donated to them and what their vested interests are in.

      Reform is the personal hype machine of Nigel Farage and exists solely to keep that pound shop Oswald Moseley in the newspapers.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        06 months ago

        I’m aware they are a hype machine.

        But you can’t doubt the effect UKIP had on the UK relationship with the EU. (Even though I voted remain)

        I’m hoping they can also do something about immigration.